Conversation
Member
Author
|
Link to issue: #482 |
Member
Author
|
We cannot completely remove PETSc dependencies because we still use METIS from PETSc. |
Collaborator
Hi Einar, I think it should be possible to use METIS installed from GMSH. This could avoid keeping PETSc only because of METIS. |
asamake
approved these changes
Nov 2, 2020
Member
Author
|
Hi Abdoulaye, It turns out that we already use METIS from GMSH, not PETSc like I thought. So I was wrong and after this merge we have no dependence on PETSc anymore. |
Collaborator
|
Hi Einar, ok super. Thank you. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove the implicit solver and all connections with PETSc.
I would like to ask @asamake to aprove this pull request.
I'd like to ask @akorosov to create a new docker image without PETSc.