Skip to content

Conversation

@marklawlor
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 1, 2025 12:47
Copy link
Contributor Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Replaces the previously direct re-export of react-native's ScrollView with a local implementation, presumably to fix issues with automatic transform logic.

  • Adds getter returning ./ScrollView.ScrollView
  • Removes prior getter returning react-native ScrollView

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

},
get ScrollView() {
return require("./ScrollView").ScrollView;
},
Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes the public API from directly re-exporting react-native's ScrollView to a custom implementation. If the custom ScrollView does not maintain full prop/behavior parity (e.g., forwarded ref handling, static members, scroll event props), this could be a breaking change. Consider confirming parity, documenting the change, or providing a transitional alias to avoid unexpected regressions.

Suggested change
},
},
// Transitional alias for the original react-native ScrollView
get RNScrollView() {
return require("./ScrollView").RNScrollView;
},

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@marklawlor marklawlor merged commit 63242a0 into main Oct 1, 2025
7 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merge activity

@marklawlor marklawlor deleted the 10-01-fix_scrollview_not_working_with_automatic_transform branch October 1, 2025 12:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants