Skip to content

Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.28.0#10489

Merged
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo
Mar 28, 2025
Merged

Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.28.0#10489
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Mar 27, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.26.1 -> 8.28.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.26.1 -> 8.28.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/utils (source) 8.26.1 -> 8.28.0 age adoption passing confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.26.1 -> 8.28.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.28.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-nullish-coalescing] support if statement assignment (??=) and fix several minor bugs (#​10861)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unsafe-function-type] remove fixable property (#​10986)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.27.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • utils: support DeprecatedInfo for rule.meta.deprecated (#​10932)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.28.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.27.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/utils)

v8.28.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for utils to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.27.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • utils: support DeprecatedInfo for rule.meta.deprecated (#​10932)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.28.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.27.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 4f713e8 to 35d6293 Compare March 28, 2025 03:05
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 35d6293 to 016b8b1 Compare March 28, 2025 06:49
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Code Coverage Report: Only Changed Files listed

Package Coverage
Overall Coverage 🟢 30.56%

Minimum allowed coverage is 0%, this run produced 30.56%

@renovate renovate Bot merged commit 7f11650 into main Mar 28, 2025
@renovate renovate Bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch March 28, 2025 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants