CI: GHA: Make proper use of ccache in CodeQL builds#24
Merged
Conversation
According to https://github.blog/changelog/2025-06-03-codeql-can-be-enabled-at-scale-on-c-c-repositories-in-public-preview-using-build-free-scanning/ we can use `build-mode: none` since Jun 2025, and be free to speed up building code with ccache or not build it at all. Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
… usage during the CI build Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…far only "manual" though) Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
"c" and "cpp" are older names, now aliases to this one Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…, to ensure update of the stored cache Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…ase with "manual" vs. "none" values Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 41015e9. Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…e steps" This reverts commit 7c21bad. Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…ccache archives Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…rent object files are made by "compiler"; re-enable build-mode:manual Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…r and delete after use The `hashFiles()` method may only look at files under `GITHUB_WORKSPACE` per https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/expressions#hashfiles Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…value abuse Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…id direct hit on non-hash variants Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
Contributor
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
jimklimov
added a commit
to jimklimov/nut
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2025
…rience from networkupstools/wmnut#24 Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 3d735b0. Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Speed up CI a bit; prototype for main NUT (maybe).