chore: add CODEOWNERS so every PR gets a reviewer assigned - #60
Merged
Conversation
Nothing currently requests review automatically, so PRs from outside the repo sit unnoticed: two community pull requests (#46, #47) have been open since 31 July, and four Dependabot PRs are open against eight vulnerability alerts. A single fallback owner fixes that. GitHub does not request review from a PR's own author, so this assigns every PR except Anna's own, which is the intended behaviour rather than a side effect. Deliberately a fallback-only file, in the same shape nextcloud/server uses: one broad rule first, narrower ones added later as the repository grows more maintainers. Note this only *requests* review; making it blocking would need "Require review from Code Owners" in the ruleset, which is a separate decision. AI-Assisted-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) Signed-off-by: Anna Larch <anna@nextcloud.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Approval recommended
The change is straightforward and functional; only a minor wording inconsistency in a comment was noted.
Pull request overview
Adds a repository-wide CODEOWNERS fallback so every pull request triggers an automatic review request, helping avoid PRs sitting unreviewed.
Changes:
- Introduces
.github/CODEOWNERSwith a catch-all rule assigning a default reviewer. - Documents intended behavior (author won’t be requested) and how to extend with narrower rules later.
File summaries
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| .github/CODEOWNERS | Adds a fallback code owner to automatically request reviews on all PRs. |
Review details
- Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
- Comments generated: 1
- Review effort level: Lite
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Anna <anna@nextcloud.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Nothing currently requests review automatically on this repository, so pull requests from outside sit unnoticed. Right now:
A single fallback owner fixes that.
GitHub never requests review from the author of a pull request, so this assigns every PR except my own. That is the intended behaviour rather than a side effect.
Deliberately fallback-only, in the same shape
nextcloud/serveruses: one broad rule first, with narrower rules added below it as the repository grows more maintainers (the last matching pattern wins).Note this only requests review. Making it blocking would need "Require review from Code Owners" in the ruleset, which is a separate decision.
AI-Assisted-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context)