Skip to content

Multiple changes in NXoptical_specroscopy, NXellipsometry, NXraman#1543

Closed
RonHildebrandt wants to merge 1167 commits intonexusformat:mainfrom
FAIRmat-NFDI:multiple_optical_spec_changes
Closed

Multiple changes in NXoptical_specroscopy, NXellipsometry, NXraman#1543
RonHildebrandt wants to merge 1167 commits intonexusformat:mainfrom
FAIRmat-NFDI:multiple_optical_spec_changes

Conversation

@RonHildebrandt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • Includes relaxation of URL requirement in NXraman
  • Introducing the nameType=partial
  • Changing environment in optical spectroscopy for the same do be directly dereived from NXsample and not from generic environment.
  • Relaxing requirements of detector type

lukaspie and others added 30 commits July 8, 2024 16:58
…NXms with NXmicrostructure to avoid confusing the symbol convention with mass spectrometry as the abbreviation NXms may suggest
…con and eventually make this NXmicrostructure
Co-authored-by: Florian Dobener <florian.dobener@physik.hu-berlin.de>
…ate_system_set because that is what these conventions only talk about
lukaspie and others added 26 commits November 22, 2024 09:29
use same CI/CD like nexusformat/definitions
* First final draft for application definiton NXsts,
NXstm, NXaf, NXspm and base classes NXlockin,
NXbias_spectroscopy, cantilever_spm, NXbias_sweep,
NXpiezo_config_spm, NXpositioner_spm, NXscan_control,
NXpiezoelectric_material and NXrcs.

Finish review comments from Lev.

* Remove SPM folder.

* Remove SPM folder.

Revert "Remove SPM folder."

This reverts commit 3aeb39e.

PR review from Lukas!

Delete unnecessary files.

Revert "Delete unnecessary files."

This reverts commit 317a367.

Include the default key attribute on entry and include NXhistory under the NXsample for verbose purpose.

* Review from Tamash (#303)

* space.

* Modified some descriptions trying to clarify the meaning of the elements. Please check them! Modified:Update NXafm.yaml

* NXbias_spectroscopy.yaml

* Update NXscan.yaml

I just added a slight clarification what we mean under the word scan.
However, it makes me wonder whether this should be more a base class than an application definition.
And whether the control parameter set should be only positional.
So, I have some doubts here...

* Update NXcantilever_spm.yaml

added some explanation and clarification to the cantilever properties and what are the driving details of cantilever oscillations

* Update NXcircuit.yaml

minor changes to allow for multichannel boards, e.g. 4 or 16 channel A/D converters or amplifiers

* Update NXlockin.yaml

Minor changes in documentation,
removed some redundant information on the demodulated signal.

* Update NXpiezo_config_spm.yaml

minimal changes in docstrings

* Update NXpositioner_spm.yaml

minor correction, the Z positioner has no idea where the sample is, so sample - probe distance is unknown at this point

* Update NXscan_control.yaml

some minor comment changes

* Generated nxdl files.

* Revert "Update NXscan.yaml"

This reverts commit 3f376f0.
This file is covered by #304  #304
---------

Co-authored-by: T. Haraszti <haraszti@dwi.rwth-aachen.de>

Rename lockin_current_flip_number to loockin_current_flip_sign.

add NXidentifier in NXsensor_scan.

Delete unnecessary file.

Revert "Delete unnecessary file."

This reverts commit 8c6b03c.

Preparation for example in nomad.

Corrected typo in heterodyne word Update NXlockin.yaml

Minor fix.

* Remove redundant files.
Remove the `default` attribute from the base class NXpositioner.
* fix calibration_time in yaml.

* fix calibration_time in nxdl.xml.
…_env of SAMPLE in NXoptical_spec, make URLS recommended
@RonHildebrandt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

chosed wrong branch...

@RonHildebrandt RonHildebrandt deleted the multiple_optical_spec_changes branch February 25, 2025 08:38
@RonHildebrandt RonHildebrandt restored the multiple_optical_spec_changes branch February 25, 2025 08:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants