What's in this release
This release adds a machine-readable evidence traceability layer to the CDFI Framework — the missing link between the seven-step translation documents and the computable artifacts they produced.
New: claims/ folder — 8 JSON evidence packs
Each file proves how a specific Anthropic AI safety research publication became a specific CDFI mechanism. Every claim carries verbatim paper extracts with section/page citations, Direct/Derived/Original Construct typing, and a cdfi_element_produced field linking the claim to its formula artifact (gate constant, column weight, certification threshold, scoring rule).
| File | Publication → Mechanism |
|---|---|
claims/pub1-evaluation-criteria.json |
Challenges in Evaluating AI Systems → four-column weighting matrix |
claims/pub1-rubric-reliability.json |
Challenges in Evaluating AI Systems → four-part certification protocol |
claims/pub2-hallucination-gate.json |
Auditing for Hidden Objectives → hallucination gate (CAP_VALUE = 40) |
claims/pub3-statistical-rigor.json |
Statistical Approach to Model Evaluations → 95% CI + deployment tier thresholds |
claims/pub4-framing-sensitivity.json |
Discrimination in Language Model Decisions → relativism resistance gate |
claims/pub5-confidence-calibration.json |
CoT Faithfulness + Discrimination (combined) → confidence calibration (original construct) |
claims/pub6-categorical-failures.json |
Sabotage Evaluations → five failure mode taxonomy + cap gate architecture |
claims/pub7-adversarial-probing.json |
Evaluating Feature Steering → adversarial prompt variant + prompt sensitivity drift |
Schema reference, file index, and adaptation notes from applied-ai-research-translator: claims/README.md
Extended: Source Evidence Records in all 8 translation documents
Every translation document in docs/translations/ now carries a Source Evidence Record — verbatim paper text anchoring each pipeline step, with claim types marked and inference chains shown for all Derived steps. Translation 8 (confidence calibration) explicitly marks its convergent claim as an Original Construct with no source quote, because none exists.
What is still open
| Item | Status |
|---|---|
| Authority level classification (400 prompts) | Pending — theological advisors |
| Human theological review (21,599 scores) | Pending — Filip Ponulak + advisors |
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 mapping | Deferred to v1.6 |
| Security remediations (prompt injection, pipeline integrity, signing) | Deferred to v1.6 |
Full changelog: CHANGELOG.md