Skip to content

Conversation

@canerakdas
Copy link
Member

Description

Fixes broken blog links

Validation

In preview the links on the pages below should work without any problems;

https://nodejs.org/en/blog/announcements/v20-release-announce
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/announcements/v21-release-announce
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v0.10.46
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v0.12.15
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v14.19.3
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v17.9.1
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v18.2.0
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/june-2023-security-releases
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/october-2023-security-releases

Check List

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
  • I have run npx turbo lint to ensure the code follows the style guide. And run npx turbo lint:fix to fix the style errors if necessary.
  • I have run npx turbo format to ensure the code follows the style guide.
  • I have run npx turbo test to check if all tests are passing.
  • I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

@canerakdas canerakdas requested review from a team as code owners November 13, 2023 19:15
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 13, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 13, 2023 8:07pm

@ovflowd
Copy link
Member

ovflowd commented Nov 13, 2023

@canerakdas I think I didnt explain, but I wonder if instead of <> links you could transform into [] links? because then we can keep them relative instead of absolute which allows nextjs features to be taken in place

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 13, 2023

Lighthouse Results

URL Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO Report
/en 🟢 100 🟢 97 🟢 92 🟢 92 🔗
/en/about 🟢 100 🟢 95 🟢 92 🟢 92 🔗
/en/about/previous-releases 🟢 98 🟢 96 🟢 92 🟢 92 🔗
/en/download 🟢 100 🟢 97 🟢 92 🟢 92 🔗
/en/blog 🟢 94 🟢 97 🟢 92 🟢 92 🔗

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Coverage Report

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 84%
79.34% (361/455) 64.81% (70/108) 63.04% (58/92)

Unit Test Report

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
54 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 7.758s ⏱️

@ovflowd
Copy link
Member

ovflowd commented Nov 13, 2023

I'm fast-tracking this as a critical bug fix for certain links of the website. Thank you for taking care of this, @canerakdas! Super appreciate it!

cc @nodejs/nodejs-website

@ovflowd ovflowd added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 13, 2023
Merged via the queue into nodejs:main with commit a5a3815 Nov 13, 2023
@ovflowd ovflowd added the fast-track Fast Tracking PRs label Nov 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-track Fast Tracking PRs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants