fix(rspack): make rspack dev server respect port#28251
Merged
Coly010 merged 5 commits intonrwl:masterfrom Oct 16, 2024
Merged
Conversation
Fixes the port issue reported in nrwl#28040
samtsai
requested review from
AgentEnder,
FrozenPandaz,
JamesHenry,
jaysoo and
vsavkin
as code owners
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Contributor
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 2c7ab9a. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 4 targets
Sent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
Coly010
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
jaysoo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2024
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before posting an PR --> <!-- https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr --> <!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format --> <!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` --> <!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes, and generate it for you if appropriate. --> ## Current Behavior <!-- This is the behavior we have today --> Port is not respected from `rspack.config.[jt]s` and needs to be explicitly set in `project.json` options. ## Expected Behavior <!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR --> Port should be configurable via config, options, etc. ## Related Issue(s) <!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is merged. --> Fixes #28040 (port portion)
Contributor
|
This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Current Behavior
Port is not respected from
rspack.config.[jt]sand needs to be explicitly set inproject.jsonoptions.Expected Behavior
Port should be configurable via config, options, etc.
Related Issue(s)
Fixes #28040 (port portion)