chore: prod to test backmerge#147
Conversation
chore: test to prod
* fix: reverted status grouping (#100) * fix: fix for panic on log container closure * build(deps): bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.22.0 to 0.31.0 (#87) Bumps [golang.org/x/crypto](https://github.com/golang/crypto) from 0.22.0 to 0.31.0. - [Commits](golang/crypto@v0.22.0...v0.31.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: golang.org/x/crypto dependency-type: indirect ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * build(deps): bump golang.org/x/net from 0.26.0 to 0.33.0 (#105) Bumps [golang.org/x/net](https://github.com/golang/net) from 0.26.0 to 0.33.0. - [Commits](golang/net@v0.26.0...v0.33.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: golang.org/x/net dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: Shiv <3078106+blue4209211@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
chore: test to prod
chore: test to prod
chore: test to prod
chore: test to prod
chore: disable sensitive log parsing
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @mayankpande88, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request is a routine backmerge from production to the test branch, incorporating a change that modifies the default behavior of sensitive log parsing by disabling it.
Highlights
- Configuration Change: Updated the default value for the
DisableSensitiveLogParsingflag inflags/flags.gofromfalsetotrue.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request backmerges a change from production to test, specifically altering the default value of the DisableSensitiveLogParsing flag in flags/flags.go. This changes the default behavior of sensitive log parsing from enabled to disabled. I've reviewed the change based on correctness, efficiency, maintainability, and security, defaulting to common Go style guides like Effective Go and Go Code Review Comments. The primary feedback concerns the impact of changing this default behavior.
3 participants
No description provided.