feat: add @netlify/nuxt module

[serhalp]

🔗 Linked issue

😶

📚 Description

This PR adds @netlify/nuxt to the module registry. See https://npmx.dev/package/@netlify/nuxt.

The current module under the netlify name is a very outdated, unmaintained module that only supports Nuxt 2. See https://npmx.dev/package/@aceforth/nuxt-netlify. It seems reasonable to me to take the name over with the official, maintained @netlify/nuxt.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 28f98cd3-943b-427f-93b6-5e7216eb55aa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98811d0 and 479a42e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• modules/netlify.yml

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated two module manifest files. modules/netlify.yml replaces Nuxt-Netlify–specific metadata with Netlify primitives and related URLs: description, repo, npm package, icon, github, website, learn_more, maintainers, and Nuxt compatibility updated from ^2.0.0 to ^3.0.0 || ^4.0.0. modules/netlify-files.yml updates only the icon value from netlify.png to netlify.svg. No functional code changes were made.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding the @netlify/nuxt module to the registry, which is the primary objective of this PR.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining why @netlify/nuxt is being added to replace the outdated netlify module.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@modules/netlify.yml`:
- Around line 4-5: The repo field is pointing at the monorepo root (repo:
netlify/primitives) which causes sync() to read the wrong package.json; update
the repo value to reference the Nuxt package subdirectory (use repo:
netlify/primitives#main/packages/nuxt-module) so the correct package.json for
the `@netlify/nuxt` npm package is fetched and the npm field is not overwritten.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d6c77a62-f346-42f9-8b36-753bdef2b951

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e604f1e and 075e8b8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• icons/netlify.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• icons/netlify.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• modules/netlify.yml

[serhalp]

CI failure seems to be unrelated(?)

Do you think while I'm here we can remove https://github.com/nuxt/modules/blob/e604f1e7ea5f13454df886fe82666d0d28e239d2/modules/netlify-files.yml? It also seems to be quite outdated (Nuxt 2 only) and of limited value.