-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
TC Meeting Minutes20260603
John Gray edited this page Jun 3, 2026
·
3 revisions
-
Roll call taken by Bob, quorum achieved.
-
John Gray took minutes.
- Attendance:
- Bob Relyea, Hamish Cameron, John Gray, Richard Kettlewell, Aaron Curley, Deepak Gupta, Mike Markowitz, Scott Marshall, Dieter Bong, Joe Livingston, Simo Source
- Motion: That the agenda for this meeting be approved.
- Moved: Hamish, Seconded: Dieter. No comments, objections, or abstentions. Agenda approved.
- Motion: That the minutes posted for May 06, 2026 be approved.
- Moved: Dieter, Seconded: Hamish. No abstentions, objections or comments. Minutes approved.
- Motion to approve quote from TC for Press Release
- The OASIS PKCS #11 Technical Committee (TC) said, “Version 3.2 delivers a stronger, cleaner Cryptoki interface and gives implementers a clear, interoperable foundation for addressing emerging threats while maintaining compatibility with existing security infrastructure. As the cryptographic landscape shifts, PKCS #11 remains the stable core that real-world deployments depend on.”
- Moved: Hamish Moves, Seconded: John. No abstentions, objections or comments. Quote approved.
- Call for quotes of support for the v 3.2 press release: Who can try and send one by 10 June 2026?
- If sponsors want to add quote, contact Valerie, or Mary Beth Minto (OASIS) at marybeth.minto@oasis-open.org
-
In Review
- No items in review
-
In Progress
- Dieter: update on new shorter SLH-DSA parameter sets. Waiting for NIST to approve.
- Bob: #43 ML-KEM type with recommendations - No update.
- Bob: #50 C_AsyncJoin - No update.
- Bob: #36 - CI for header file modifications - No Update.
- Simo: #15 Discovery size of ciphertext - No Update.
- Hamish/Tim: #45 Cross over version - No update.
- Dieter: #84 - Single step functions: No update, but hoping to have an update next meeting.
- Dieter asked about renaming it atomic functions verses single step function (etc C_EncryptAtomic). Will publish first version using atomic wording.
- John: #100 Editorial issues in composites - will update next time.
-
To Do
- No discussion.
-
(time pending/motivated TC member) Review non-prioritized issues
- No discussion.
-
New Business
- Question from Simo: What is the position of the committee when it comes to older specs? Lots of vendors still using 2.4. We don't make any statements about it. Aaron mentioned some of the stuff they use is still 2.2! If you just add the mechanisms, there is a chance things will work, but adding new functions will likely not work. Should we deprecate or remove functions, this should be discussed? Discussion of what we consider a breaking change in the specification? One view is there is never a breaking change because we make the spec. Simo put in issue #107 for further assessment.
- Aaron moved to set next meeting for Jun 17, 2026, starting at 1PM PT. Seconded: Mike Markowitz. No objections, abstentions, or comments. Meeting date set.
- Simo
- Motion: That the meeting be adjourned.
- Moved: John. Seconded: Simo. No objections, abstentions, or comments.
- Meeting Adjourned 4:34 PM PT