Use config class instead of check-ins.web-address and check-ins.application.name
#2527
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently we have a proliferation of
@Property(name = "check-ins.web-address") String webURLfor whenever we need to send an email to the user (or create an absolute URL link back to the server)This PR replaces these with a single singleton configuration object that holds the web address and can be injected into the services as required.
This is the first step in moving all the
check-insconfiguration into code, to add type safety and reduce duplication of key names[edit] I also added
check-ins.application.nameto the config object, and replaced it's usage in the code.