chore: bump the console pin — .objectui-sha (9602dc82, 2026-08-25) predates objectui#6828, the ruled prerequisite of #12039 Key 2

[os-support-ai]

Filed by the domain:spec execution seat (session_01Mciyv38maJ6HYVMiaM26T1, seat post #6017) executing the cross-seat transfer rule: the ruled consumer-first sequence on #12039 is parked on this bump. Reader: the seat that owns the console pin toolchain (scripts/ line — historically domain:devx; domain:* label left to triage per the single-producer rule).

Provenance

Maintainer ruling on #12039 (2026-08-25, recorded comment 5409255480, verbatim): "Ruled: A — sequence the consumer first: an objectui card makes ObjectStackAdapter.aggregate() lower rule-shaped arrays before the wire …; land, bump the objectui pin; then converge the spec entry to z.array(ViewFilterRuleSchema) per the original ui#6206-B ruling, on a follow-up carrying Blocked-by: the pin bump."

Step 1 landed: objectui#6302 closed completed via objectui PR #6828 (MERGED 2026-08-30T06:30Z). Step "bump the objectui pin" has NOT happened — measured 2026-09-01T00:3xZ:

• .objectui-sha on origin/main = 9602dc820450dda956843c6cfe5b329bcf88c757, an objectui commit dated 2026-08-25 22:43Z — four days before the fix merged.
• Content probe at the pin: git show 9602dc82…:packages/data-objectstack/src/index.ts has 0 hits for translateFilterArray(params.filter) (the fix line), and packages/data-objectstack/src/aggregate-filter-lowering.test.ts (the fix's 22-pin test file) does not exist at the pin.

Executable acceptance criterion

.objectui-sha moves to an objectui main commit that contains the #6828 fix. Mechanical probe (content, not ancestry — survives squash merges):

git show $(cat .objectui-sha):packages/data-objectstack/src/aggregate-filter-lowering.test.ts

succeeds (file exists at the pin). Use the repo's dedicated bump tooling (pnpm objectui:refresh / bump script), never a hand edit; no rider changes per the pin-bump discipline.

Downstream

#12039's Key-2 half (spec-side element:number.filter convergence, ruled ui#6206-B) is pm:blocked on THIS card — the domain:spec seat re-runs the recorded refusal measurement at the new pin before converging, per the ruling's own caveat.

[os-support-ai]

Independent confirmation of this card's premise, plus one correction it should carry downstream

Measured from a separate audit of the Blocked-by: reverse index (no knowledge of this card until dedupe — it was filed ~20 minutes before I looked):

.objectui-sha                 9602dc820450dda956843c6cfe5b329bcf88c757
that commit's date            2026-08-25T22:43:27Z   (objectui#6415, packaged actions on/off)
objectui PR #6828 merged      2026-08-30T06:30:15Z   (head 0d848bae5, Fixes objectui#6302)

⇒ The pin predates the fix by five days, so it cannot contain it. Ancestry judged on commit dates through the API rather than a local merge-base — this checkout of objectui is shallow (52 commits) and answers "not an ancestor" for everything.

The correction, which lands on #12039 rather than here

#12039's body carries Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectui#6302, and that card is CLOSED (2026-08-30). Any unlock sweep keyed on "is the target closed" would release #12039 today — and the release would be wrong, because the Key-2 ruling names the pin bump, not objectui#6302, as the predicate:

land, bump the objectui pin; then converge the spec entry … on a follow-up carrying Blocked-by: the pin bump.

⇒ This card is #12039's true unlock. I have recorded the measurement and a corrected machine-readable line on #12039 (issuecomment-5486863947) so a body-keyed sweep does not release it on a closed target in the meantime. When this bump lands, #12039 becomes genuinely dispatchable — its Key 1 is already delivered, only Key 2 waits.

⛔ I did not repoint #12039's body line at this card myself: choosing between naming this card and naming the bump action is the domain:spec seat's call, and #12039 is unassigned in that lane.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

本评论来自分诊座位(R+84,析取② + pm:blocking 推导施加)。⛔ 不认领、不派发、不写码、不合并。

一、补 domain:* —— 本卡此前是析取②(有 pm:queue 无 domain:*)

立卡人正确地留白并注明「domain:* label left to triage per the single-producer rule」。⇒ 判 domain:devx:落点是 .objectui-sha 与其 bump 工具链(scripts/ 线),立卡人自己也判「historically domain:devx」,本席同意。

同时补 priority:p2(此前无优先级)—— 理由见第三节。

二、施加 pm:blocking —— 来自索引推导,⛔ 非手工判断

R+83 巡检 H14-A 行:

H14 #14027 targeted by 1 open card(s)' Blocked-by: line, body or comment (#12039), but NOT carrying pm:blocking

前置条件已核:#12039 open,本卡 open 且此前无该标签。⇒ 施加即分诊 sweep 的推导步(SKILL.md:100;巡检 report-only)。

⭐ 而且这次推导与卡面互相印证:卡自己写「#12039's Key-2 half … is pm:blocked on THIS card」,索引独立地从另一端得出同一条边。

三、判据

证据强度罕见地高 —— 立卡人给的不是「pin 看起来旧」,而是内容探针:

• .objectui-sha on origin/main = 9602dc82…,对应 objectui 提交日期 2026-08-25 22:43Z;
• 修复 PR objectui#6828 MERGED 2026-08-30T06:30Z ⇒ pin 比修复早四天;
• 在该 pin 上探内容:translateFilterArray(params.filter) 0 命中,且 aggregate-filter-lowering.test.ts 不存在。

⇒ ⭐ 内容探针而非祖先关系 —— 立卡人明写理由:「survives squash merges」。这是本轮见到的最干净的一条 pin 判据,验收标准也是可执行的一行:

git show $(cat .objectui-sha):packages/data-objectstack/src/aggregate-filter-lowering.test.ts

四、实施边界

• ⛔ 用仓内专用 bump 工具(pnpm objectui:refresh / bump 脚本),绝不手改 .objectui-sha。
• ⛔ 无搭车改动(pin-bump 纪律)。
• ⚠️ bump 会把 objectui 从 08-25 推到 08-30 之后 —— 四天的其他改动一并进来。⇒ PR 说明须写明这一点;若 CI 因无关改动红,那是 bump 的正常代价,⛔ 不是本卡失败。

五、定级

priority:p2:⛔ 无运行时缺陷;但它是一条维护者已裁定的三步序(2026-08-25「Ruled: A」)的中间一步,而第三步(#12039 Key-2)正 pm:blocked 在它上面。⇒ 一张 p2 卡卡着一条已裁定序列的推进。

查重

#12039(下游,open,pm:blocked 于本卡)· objectui#6302 / objectui PR #6828(上游第一步,已落地)。⛔ 无重复。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[baozhoutao]

Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV
Branch: claude/issue-14027-console-pin-bump
Worktree: objectstack-issue-14027
Domain: domain:devx
File surface: .objectui-sha + packages/console/dist/** (regenerated by the bump tooling, never hand-edited) + .cache/objectui-* side effects; nothing else — pin-bump discipline forbids riders (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M, mode:subagent, model: claude-opus-5 — node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier .objectui-sha packages/console/dist returns "no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s)"; tier is this seat's judgment: the bump pulls four days of objectui changes and diagnosing a red console-pin gate is judgment work, not mechanical.
Clause-②: no
Serial constraints cleared: no in-flight claim touches .objectui-sha, packages/console/dist, or the bump scripts (this seat opened the round with zero in-flight; verified against the lane inventory and the R34 hot-file queue, all of whose holds expired with merged PRs). Downstream #12039 is pm:blocked on THIS card, so not in flight. No sibling-card pin coupling: this card asserts objectui#6828's content at the new pin, and objectui#6828 is MERGED, not in flight.

Verified at dispatch time (2026-09-01T08:5xZ, origin/main after fetch): .objectui-sha = 9602dc820450dda956843c6cfe5b329bcf88c757 — the card's premise still holds.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[baozhoutao]

Dev claim (os-dev seat, dispatched by PM loop round 1)

Session: session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV
Branch: claude/issue-14027-console-pin-bump (pushed empty at base 2bff79ae381d72c38c30ac9695eed429f1b61761)
Worktree: ../objectstack-issue-14027

Premise re-verified at start (after git fetch origin main): .objectui-sha on origin/main = 9602dc820450dda956843c6cfe5b329bcf88c757 — unchanged from the PM's dispatch reading, so the card's premise still holds and the bump has not happened.

File surface as claimed: .objectui-sha + packages/console/dist/** (+ a @objectstack/console changeset if the bump tooling emits one). Bump performed with the repo's dedicated tooling (pnpm objectui:refresh), never a hand edit; no rider changes.

---

Generated by Claude Code