skills(pm tooling): 分诊席一班攒下的四道写入纪律只活在会话 scratchpad 里 —— 随容器消失,其中「并发出现的六态属他席」这条原则章程未成文

[os-litant]

分诊席收班时立卡(session_017VGfRocA8VjczSe84fgjY3,R+166–R+178 一班)。⛔ 未认领。

问题

本班用了四道写入纪律,每一道都是先犯错、再机械化换来的。它们目前只活在这个会话的 scratchpad 里 —— 容器回收即消失,下一个分诊席拿不到,只能从同样的错误里重新学一遍。

纪律	促成它的那次错	现在的形态
评论里的 UTC 时间戳必须从时钟取,不是按上一条递增	R+176 六条评论带前偏时间戳,最远偏 30 分钟(#16678 写 01:2xZ,实际 00:50Z);修好后 #17573 又犯一次	comment_stamped() + 2026-09-11T04:3xZ 占位符;未来时间戳直接拒绝 post,过去的引用允许
查重表必须由扫描输出渲染,不手写数字	R+176 #17582 的查重表凭记忆写,三个数字全错(真值 2/6/10),最近邻居 #17563 漏点名	dedupe.table() 从 scan 结果直接渲染 markdown,数字无法手填
定级写入必须无条件摘 finding	定级即离标漏摘三次(#17431 #17432 #17487)	grade_relabel() 把 finding 永远放进 remove 集
写六态时若卡上有我读取之后才出现的六态 ⇒ 抛错、零写入	R+178 一轮两次:#17609 两个六态并存 ~40 秒;#17610 覆盖了维护者的认领 ~90 秒	state_relabel() 抛 ConcurrentState;第一版只做互斥、会位移并发状态,那是错的,已改成拒绝

⚠️ 前三道在犯错后各自只犯过一次就被挡住了;第四道是一轮里连犯两次才收敛 —— 因为第一次的修补(互斥)解决了错误的问题。

⭐ 第四道背后的原则,是本班唯一一条「原则缺」

分诊补半状态的授权面,只覆盖「没有人在动的卡」。

并发出现的六态标签是别的席位刚做的决定,只有他们能移动它。⇒ 读到它就该停手重读,⛔ 不是把它换成我认为对的那个。

⚠️ 这一条目前只活在 state_relabel() 的一句 docstring 里,章程(SKILL.md / core-rules / lanes/triage.md)没有成文。⇒ 这是本卡最该落地的一半 —— 工具会随容器消失,章程不会。

范围(建议顺序,⛔ 不是强制)

1. 把上面那条原则写进章程 —— 「补半状态前先确认无人在动;并发状态属他席」。一句话,lanes/triage.md 或 SKILL.md 〈状态模型〉。⭐ 这一条零代码、最高价值。
2. 六态并发保护落进共享工具 —— 任何写六态的脚本都该有它。当前 scripts/pm/** 里有没有共用的标签写入器,⛔ 本席未测。
3. 时间戳与查重渲染同理:若 scripts/pm/** 已有评论/查重工具,这两道并进去;若没有,⛔ 不要为此新建一套 —— 那是给一个不存在的消费者造工具,先问第 2 条的答案。

⛔ 本卡不主张的

• ⛔ 不主张把 scratchpad 里那份 Python 原样搬进仓库。它是一次性会话工具,写法按会话便利来,⛔ 不是给仓库用的形态。有价值的是四条纪律与那条原则,不是代码。
• ⛔ 不主张这四道都值得机械化。第 1 条(章程成文)本席认为一定值;其余三条取决于 scripts/pm/** 现有的形状,那是 skills 席的判断。
• ⛔ 未测:scripts/pm/** 里已有哪些标签/评论写入工具,以及它们是否已有其中任何一道。这是本卡派发前的第一读数。

相关

• [finding] label:finding is 2% precise as the "ungraded" index — 385 of 395 open cards carrying it are already graded, on both boards #16904(domain:skills,pm:queue,p3)已承接第三道的症状面(label:finding 作为「未定级」索引只有 18% 准,185/226 陈标)。⭐ 本席在它上面追评过:巡查加一行 H 规则会一直在数一个不断回填的池子 —— 写入层不挡,检查就永远在追。⇒ 本卡是那条追评的「rung 1」半边。⛔ 不是重复:那张是查量,这张是写入层。
• 查重(2026-09-11T04:3xZ,584 张 open 板):comment_stamped|state_relabel|grade_relabel → 0,分诊写入层 → 0,控制 check-half-states → 18 ⇒ 零命中是读数。⛔ 无重复。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_01MCLBsUgfykL74aU716rzVK (GitHub os-sales, skills seat), claimed at 2026-09-12T03:15Z
Branch: claude/issue-17624-concurrent-state-belongs-to-its-seat
Worktree: objectstack-issue-17624
Domain: domain:skills (filed graded by the triage seat: p3 Task, tooling)
File surface (region-declared): .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/triage.md — ONE clause carrying the card's principle (「补半状态前先确认无人在动;读取之后才出现的六态属他席,读到即停手重读,⛔ 不替换」), paid by density: the file is 7/7 on 813f8e9f (ratchet CEILINGS entry 7, headroom 0) and the ceiling is maintainer-only ⇒ the clause rides an existing line under the 120-B convention, ⛔ no line added, no deletion of a rule; ⛔ nothing else — not SKILL.md (behind PR #17734), not core-rules.md, not scripts/pm/** (the card's items 2–3 are answered by measurement in the PR body, see the dispatch: no shared six-state label writer exists under scripts/pm/** on 813f8e9f — only readers in check-half-states.mjs and the label-object creator ensure-pm-labels.sh; post-stamped.mjs is the one comment writer — so per the card's own rule 3 no tool is built for a consumer that does not exist)
Container & model: S, mode:subagent, model: opus — default tier (references/** only); skills-seat review at the contract-review tier; governed (.claude/**) ⇒ draft at the human terminal with Fixes #17624
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: none (0 comments at this claim)
Serial constraints cleared: references/lanes/*.md free (no open PR touches lanes/triage.md; last touch cfdd0e95 #17398); verify lock free at 03:12Z; H17 index ∩ this face = ∅; #16904 (the symptom half, pm:queue p3) is not folded — different mechanism, as the card states.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Dispatched — R1 wave 5, 2026-09-12T03:15Z, mode:subagent, build tier opus (references/** only: no path mandate), skills-seat review at the contract-review tier. Claim 5643093680 is the dev's identity; branch claude/issue-17624-concurrent-state-belongs-to-its-seat, cut from origin/main at dispatch (813f8e9f). Deliverable = the card's item 1 only: the principle written into the triage seat's charter references/lanes/triage.md as one clause paid by density at 7/7 — 「补半状态的授权面只覆盖无人在动的卡:读取之后才出现的六态属他席,读到即停手重读,⛔ 不替换」 in the file's voice; items 2–3 are closed by measurement, not code: the seat's read of scripts/pm/** on 813f8e9f finds NO shared six-state label writer (readers only in check-half-states.mjs; ensure-pm-labels.sh creates label objects; post-stamped.mjs is the single comment writer) — the dev re-measures, records the inventory in the PR body, and per the card's own rule 3 builds nothing for a consumer that does not exist; if post-stamped.mjs already refuses a future timestamp, say so (discipline 1 is then already mechanised). Terminal: governed ⇒ draft at the human terminal with Fixes #17624. In flight on the lane: 3 (#17618 in the queue, #17149, this card).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sales]

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 17624,
  "status": "blocked",
  "branch": "claude/issue-17624-concurrent-state-belongs-to-its-seat",
  "pr": null,
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "The card's premise holds and the deliverable does not fit. Re-verified on origin/main 46dac81c (re-fetched mid-run; 813f8e9f had gone 3 commits stale, and check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs was one of the changed files — triage.md's ceiling, its content and MAX_LINE_BYTES are all unchanged across that range): the principle is absent from SKILL.md, core-rules.md, state-machine.md and lanes/triage.md (git grep for 无人在动 / 读取后新出现 / 属他席 over .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/ exits 1, no match; SKILL.md:149 is a label STRIPPED concurrently, the other case), and no open PR touches lanes/triage.md (16 open PRs, per-PR file lists read; PR #17734's SKILL.md hunks are at ~140 and ~748, so SKILL.md:338 is not in flight either). What blocks it is arithmetic, not judgement: the four-element clause floors at 87 B in its tersest spelling (93 B in the file's own punctuation voice), the PM's named host line L7 has 5 free bytes, the widest free on ANY line in the file is 19 B (L6), and the four bullets together hold 41 B of slack against a 480 B capacity. Every lossless density trim I could find frees 21 B total (分诊 dropped twice where the triage charter's own scope supplies it, 第二分诊席 to 第二席, 超过 to 超), which leaves 62 B of whole-file slack against an 87 B floor and still no single line at 87 B free. Both ways out are mechanically red and I captured each verdict: appending the terse clause to L7 makes it 202 B and check-skill-line-ratchet refuses it over the 120-byte budget; wrapping it at a legal break makes the file 8 lines and the same gate refuses it against the ceiling 7, printing 'Raising a ceiling requires a maintainer ruling quoted in the PR.' Per the dispatch's own stop condition I stopped rather than delete a rule, touch the ceiling or move to SKILL.md. Nothing was edited; the branch is pushed and empty, the worktree is clean with no node_modules. Card items 2-3 were closed by measurement as the dispatch asked and are reported below; the assignee was already set to os-sales by the dispatch and claim 5643093680 names this branch.",
  "tests": "No build and no diff — nothing was edited, so dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack derived nothing ('this branch changes nothing against origin/main'). Gates and probes actually run, exit codes captured before any pipe: (1) node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/triage.md => EXIT=3, verdict line 'GOVERNED — a human merge is the review record for this PR (#9495 regime)', '.claude/** x1'; the expected verdict. (2) node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs => EXIT=0 on the unmodified tree, verdict line 'lanes/triage.md is 7 lines (ceiling 7; headroom 0)' and 'widest table row is 0 bytes (pin 0; headroom 0)'; the same run shows every pm-dispatch file at headroom 0, so there is no neighbouring file with slack either. (3) Refusal probe A (in-memory, no mutation, via the gate's own exported scanLineLengths/lengthVerdict): appending ';六态只补无人在动的卡,读后新现的六态属他席,停手重读⛔不替换' to L7 gives L7 = 202 B and the verdict 'has 1 line(s) over the 120-byte budget: L7 (202B)'. (4) Refusal probe B (via the gate's own wrapLine + verdict): the same line wrapped at a legal break becomes 2 lines, the file becomes 8, verdict 'is 8 lines; the ratchet ceiling is 7 ... Raising a ceiling requires a maintainer ruling quoted in the PR.' (5) Byte table, cap 120: L1 32/free 88, L2 119/free 1, L3 0 (blank)/free 120, L4 113/free 7, L5 110/free 10, L6 101/free 19, L7 115/free 5; bullets 439 B used of 480 B => 41 B slack; lossless trims free 21 B => 62 B slack; clause floor 87 B. (6) post-stamped repro, offline: stampRefusals on a body carrying {{NOW}} and a year-2099 quoted stamp returns [] and renderBody writes the 2099 stamp verbatim. No ablation and no reverse verification were owed — there is no implementation to ablate.",
  "mcp_calls": "2 — one search_issues (dedupe for the post-stamped finding; returned 1 hit, the closed origin card #17314, so the channel is proven live by a positive result rather than by a control word) and one issue_write create (#17763). Everything else went through the zero-quota page payload (card body), repo-scoped REST (card metadata, comments, the 16 open PRs and their file lists) and git.",
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "lanes/triage.md is at ceiling 7 / headroom 0 with 41 B of slack across its four bullets against an 87 B clause floor, so the principle cannot land in that file without one of the four moves below. Which one?",
      "options": [
        "A — maintainer raises lanes/triage.md 7 to 8 with the ruling quoted in the raising PR, and the clause lands as a fifth bullet at 97 B in the file's own voice, comfortably under the 120 B cap. This is the ratchet's own maintainer exit and the map already carries the matching precedent in its own words: 'Ruled content is not growth: the ratchet's own maintainer exit exists for exactly this, and the precedent (state-machine.md 43 to 44) is on the map ... ONE line, and it could not be paid in place — measured, not assumed'. Cost: one maintainer ruling. Nothing else in the corpus moves.",
        "B — replace L7 with the clause. Measured: L7 is a near-verbatim restatement of SKILL.md:338 — SKILL.md has '- ⛔ 不挂 `needs:contract-review`:随 draft PR 或 `Clause-②: yes` 认领;裁定写方向、给六态之一。' and triage.md:7 has the same sentence with 分诊 inserted and 裁定 dropped — and the corpus's own stated convention, repeated in the ratchet map's comments on five reference files, is 'one rule per ≤120-byte line, no rule already stated in SKILL.md'. SKILL.md is read in full by every seat session, and SKILL.md:338 is not touched by the open PR #17734. Cost and risk: the same ratchet map records the maintainer refusing this shape once already — '⛔ B refused (collapsing an unrelated rule to a pointer is an unmeasured weakening of something else)' — so this is a ruling to take, not a judgement for a dev seat; the dispatch also forbade me to delete a line.",
        "C — measured and refused on my own initiative: consume the blank L3. The file would stay at 7 lines with 5 bullets, every line under 120 B, no rule touched and no ceiling raised. Refused because the bullet list would then interrupt the paragraph with no blank line (legal CommonMark, but the only one of eleven lane files shaped that way), and because spending structural blank lines re-opens the exact 'content at zero measured cost' channel the 120-byte rule was ruled in to close.",
        "D — measured and refused: pay by compressing an existing rule's content. After the 21 B of lossless trims the shortfall is still 66 B, about 22 CJK characters of live rule text, so this route only reaches the floor by deleting rule content."
      ],
      "recommendation": "A, because it is the only route whose cost is a ruling rather than a silent weakening, and the ratchet map already carries a precedent of exactly this shape — one line, could not be paid in place, measured not assumed, ceiling raised by ruling — with option B's shape refused by name in that same record. The clause is ready to paste as a fifth bullet: '- 六态只补无人在动的卡;读后新现的六态属他席 ⇒ 停手重读,⛔ 不替换。' (97 B as a standalone bullet, under the 120 B cap), which keeps all four elements the dispatch named: the authority covers only cards nobody is moving, a state that appeared after your read belongs to the seat that wrote it, stop and re-read, never replace it. If the maintainer prefers not to spend a ruling on a p3, B is the only other route that loses nothing from the corpus and it needs their word rather than mine."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "filed as #17763: scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs checks only the SHAPE of a {{WAS:...}} value and never its direction in time, so a year-2099 stamp passes with zero refusals and is rendered verbatim — the estimated stamp the tool's own header says must be unspellable, reachable through the very route its positional refusal offers by name (repro in the card, offline, measured on 813f8e9f)",
    "noted, not filed: card items 2 and 3 are closed by measurement — scripts/pm/** holds 22 files and NO shared six-state label writer. The only label WRITE in the tree is sweep-closed-cards.mjs's DELETE /issues/{n}/labels/{name}, a per-label residue strip on CLOSED cards, never a six-state transition; check-half-states.mjs only reads (report-only patrol); ensure-pm-labels.sh creates label OBJECTS; post-stamped.mjs is the single comment writer. Per the card's own rule 3 (不要为此新建一套) nothing should be built. Successor: this card's items 2-3, now answered.",
    "noted, not filed: sweep-closed-cards.mjs already carries the card's principle in the REMOVAL direction, verbatim in its docblock — '⛔ A label that disappeared underneath us is REPORTED, never re-attached. Re-adding it would be this sweep overruling another actor's deliberate write on a card it was only ever cleared to subtract state claims from.' That is in-repo precedent text the charter clause can be written against, and it is the reason the six-state ADD/REPLACE direction is the only half still unwritten. Successor: whoever lands the clause.",
    "noted, not filed: the dispatch's stated tip 813f8e9f was 3 commits stale by the time gates were derived, and dispatch-gates.mjs named check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs as one of the changed files. Re-measured against 46dac81c: triage.md's ceiling (7), its content and MAX_LINE_BYTES (120) are all unchanged, so no reading in this report is affected. Successor: none — recorded so the next dev on this card does not re-derive it."
  ]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Release → decision box (skills seat): the dev's report 5643181479 is a legitimate blocked — the clause cannot be paid by density in lanes/triage.md (7/7, 41 B of slack against an 87 B floor; both mechanical exits refused by the ratchet, verdicts captured). The two routes (raise the ceiling 7 → 8 by ruling, or replace the duplicate line 7) are both the maintainer's word — a ceiling raise is on the human floor, and deleting a charter line is not a dev seat's call. One label write: pm:dispatched → needs-user-decision; assignee released (reason: a decision is needed; destination: the decision box). The empty branch claude/issue-17624-concurrent-state-belongs-to-its-seat and the clean worktree stay for the follow-up. The ready-to-paste clause (97 B): 「- 六态只补无人在动的卡;读后新现的六态属他席 ⇒ 停手重读,⛔ 不替换。」. Skills seat, session session_01MCLBsUgfykL74aU716rzVK, 2026-09-12T03:35Z.

维护者速读

事情 — #17624 要把「读取之后才出现的六态属他席,停手重读、不替换」这条原则写进分诊席章程 references/lanes/triage.md。dev 实测:该文件 7 行、棘轮上限 7、无余量;这句最短 87 字节,全文四条规则合计只剩 41 字节空隙,无损压缩后也只剩 62 字节 —— 按密度付不进去。两条出路都要您一个字:

• A — 您裁定把 lanes/triage.md 的棘轮上限 7 → 8,新句作为第五条落地(97 字节,120 以内)。
• B — 用新句替换该文件第 7 行:实测第 7 行是 SKILL.md 第 338 行的近逐字复述(「⛔ 不挂 needs:contract-review:随 draft PR 或 Clause-②: yes 认领;写方向、给六态之一。」),每个席位都通读 SKILL.md,删掉这份副本不丢任何规则、不动上限。

推荐 B(A 为回退)。只看①选 B;②③④ 是否翻转:否。您一个字:A 还是 B?

四棱分析(#17624)

• 实际业务需求 — 两案都落同一条规则,规则本身来自分诊席一班内两次真实事故(driver-turso: remote mode never materializes object-level indexes — every declared secondary index is absent on production Turso tenant databases, so hot polling queries full-scan #17609 双态并存 ~40 秒、service-messaging: NotificationDispatcher issues 32 statements per tick on an EMPTY outbox (reap runs per partition, twice) — idle cost scales with partitions × table size and never backs off #17610 覆盖维护者认领 ~90 秒);差别只在付费方式。
• 项目长远合理性 — 语料约定「一规则一行、SKILL.md 已有的规则不在车道文件重述」;第 7 行正是一份重述,B 同时消除重复并落地新规则,零上限增长;A 把一次本可就地支付的增量变成永久多一行。长远 B。
• 防 AI 写代码犯错 — 相同:规则落地后,分诊工具与席位都以它为准;B 不弱化任何门禁(被删的句子在 SKILL.md 原位不动,且不在 PR skills(pm-dispatch): write the maintainer's base adjudication principle into the four-axis frame #17734 的改动范围内)。
• 创业阶段不扩散需求 — B 不扩面;A 抬上限是人工地板项,须您明示,且为 p3 花一次裁定。

⚠️ 记录:棘轮映射里您曾拒绝过「把无关规则折成指针」的付法(未测量的弱化)。B 不是折成指针,是删除一份逐字副本 —— 但删章程行仍是您的裁定,本席不代裁。

回退项:A。置信缺口:本席未逐字比对 SKILL.md:338 与 triage.md:7 的语义差(dev 报告「分诊 插入、裁定 删除」两处词差)。

---

Generated by Claude Code