notification handover: decision cards assign os-zhuang, governed PRs review-request os-zhuang; retire the decision digest (#9822)

[os-warren]

Maintainer rulings (2026-08-19, PM chat, verbatim, in order): 「现在出现另外一个问题,需要我审核的清单我不知道,还是应该在 pr 的审核流程,发给 os-zhuang 审核。我的手机github 应该会收到推送消息吧」→ 实测(PR #9940 review request)→ 「推送到了,」→ 「之前定期生成的决策汇总 issue没什么用」「就是这个 [#9822]」。

裁定含义:「在等维护者」必须是 GitHub 原生可推送状态,不是座位贴/生成视图里的一段文字。 2026-08-18 的决策汇总 standing 裁定被取代。

Scope — .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(治理面,人合;682/682 棘轮天花板)

1. ACCEPT 路径分叉 clause ②(治理面 PR)加一步:留 draft 不变、⛔ 三禁不变,新增「review request os-zhuang」——draft 可点名审核且推送到手机,2026-08-19 以 PR docs(agents): name all six blocking contexts in the merge-queue rule #9940 实测(推送到达,维护者确认)。「等人合」清单从此 = GitHub Review-requested 队列,合并自动消项。
2. needs-user-decision 流程加一步:翻标签的同一笔「assign os-zhuang」;裁定誊录回卡时摘指派。决策收件箱 = Assigned 队列。存量三张(skills(checklist-test): the documented QA-run title convention matches 0 of 23 real records #9617/finding: SKILL.md's governed-PR fork says "never flip ready", while the devx seat post's standing practice flips governed ADR PRs ready-for-review so the maintainer's merge button works #9900/finding: CLAUDE.md carries no line-ratchet ceiling, while AGENTS.md does — same read path, same governance #9965)已按此执行,四仓收件箱余量由分诊下轮 sweep 补指派([Decision digest] maintainer inbox — generated view (please pin) #9822 上已留交接评论)。
3. 退役决策汇总视图:删除分诊座位职责中「逐轮刷新 decision digest / 批量裁决通道」的 standing 文本(2026-08-18 「同意」被本裁定取代);各卡 os-decision-facets 块与分诊誊录职责不变(视图本就抽取自卡,无信息丢失)。落地后关闭 [Decision digest] maintainer inbox — generated view (please pin) #9822(edit history 即归档)。
4. 行数付账:天花板 682 不动 —— 第 3 条删除的 digest 文本就是第 1/2 条新增的支付来源;若不足,按棘轮纪律找真去重,⛔ 禁 re-wrap。

验收

• pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet 682/682 绿;check:pm-governed-prose 绿;frame-sync/兼容门按 dispatch-gates 派生集跑。
• PR 本身即机制自举:治理面 ⇒ draft + review request os-zhuang。
• 模型档:clause ① fable-mandatory(--tier 实跑输出记录在案)。

Graded pm:queue, S, own-lane(skills 座,session ae0d8bd1-5667-5f58-8ff8-fa22ec154325)。热文件:SKILL.md 空闲(上一单 #9899 已落地)。

[os-warren]

Claim: session ae0d8bd1-5667-5f58-8ff8-fa22ec154325 · branch claude/issue-9976-notification-handover

即刻派发(裁定当日落地)。折叠检查:SKILL.md 热文件空闲,队列无同区第二卡 → 单卡。模型档:clause ① fable-mandatory(--tier 实跑,派生自路径面)。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-warren]

{
  "issue": 9976,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-9976-notification-handover",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/9982",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "All three edits landed in .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md at 6649fc405. (1) ACCEPT path-fork governed clause grew from three steps to four: new step requests review from os-zhuang on the draft PR, grounded in the 2026-08-19 measured push-notification fact; draft-forever and the three prohibitions kept verbatim. (2) needs-user-decision: label flip assigns os-zhuang in the same stroke, transcription/auto-adjudication unassigns in the same stroke; recorded in the state-model row (with 'inbox routing, not a claim; exempt from stale-claim reclaim'), escalation flow step 2, and the atomic four-piece record step 3. (3) Digest standing text retired: triage-seat digest-refresh duty compacted, the whole digest/batch-adjudication paragraph deleted, superseding 2026-08-19 verbatim quote recorded at the facets-block provenance line. Digest issue itself left open for PM landing accounting, not referenced from operational text (id-lint).",
  "line_budget": { "before": 682, "after": 678, "ceiling": 682, "headroom_after": 4 },
  "payment_audit": "Payment source is exactly the retired digest text: -7 lines (paragraph + blank) + -1 line (triage digest-duty compaction). Additions: +3 (ACCEPT fork step), +1 (facets provenance carrying the superseding verbatim quote); state-model row and two flow-step edits are single-line appends (zero line cost; table rows and in-line appends, not re-wraps). No pre-existing lines were re-wrapped as payment; no content beyond the digest text was cut. Content survival: batch-transcription duty survives as escalation-flow step 3 (atomic four-piece); one-board rule survives in multi-repo rule 5; facets block and validation duty untouched.",
  "tests": "All at HEAD 6649fc405, exit codes captured via redirect-then-$?, never through a pipe. dispatch-gates.mjs (no args): 'change set derived from git — 1 path(s) vs merge base 8fa4e2a76', 7 named families, 'Model tier — MANDATORY: claude-fable-5' (this card ran on it). Verdict lines: check:pm-skill-ratchet '✓ .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 678 lines (ceiling 682; headroom 4).' | check:pm-governed-prose '✓ 2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces … and claim no others.' (self-test 24 pass) | check:pm-skill-id-lint '✓ 15 file(s) clean' | check:skill-frame-sync '✓ 4 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 3 files' | check:skill-compatibility '✓ 11 SKILL.md file(s) reconciled against 77 workspace packages' | check:doc-authoring '✓ doc authoring guard: 377 files clean' | check:pm-governed-merges --self-test '✓ 77 assertions' | check:doc-formula-expressions '✓ 22 record-scoped formula example(s) … judged clean' (needed @objectstack/lint dep closure built first; first run failed ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND on unbuilt dist — build-then-green, run under the shared verify lock).",
  "reverse_verification": "Predicted in writing: 683 lines turns the ratchet RED naming the file. Observed: exit 1, '✗ check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 683 lines; the ratchet ceiling is 682.' Restored from the committed state (git checkout branch -- path), re-run exit 0 at 678, worktree clean. Governed-prose region: edit sits inside the pinned ACCEPT-fork region; gate + 24-case self-test green post-edit, all 5 register spans preserved, no new glob-shaped spans.",
  "labels_read_back": ["documentation", "size/s", "skip-changeset"],
  "pr_state_read_back": { "draft": true, "requested_reviewers": ["os-zhuang"] },
  "files_changed": [".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md"],
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": []
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-warren]

ACCEPT — PR #9982 复核通过(治理面:PR 保持 draft,等维护者合并;已按新机制 request review os-zhuang,自举验证成立 —— 本 PR 自己就是四件套的第一个执行实例)。

复核记录(session ae0d8bd1-5667-5f58-8ff8-fa22ec154325,契约复审档 fable):

• 亲取 diff:三处编辑逐条落地 —— ① 状态模型 needs-user-decision 行:Assigned 队列语义 + 同笔 assign/摘指派 + 「路由不是认领,不入死认领回收」的精确化(防 H2/死认领误伤,dev 自己想到的,对);② ACCEPT 治理分叉三件套→四件套,新 ③ = request review os-zhuang,三禁原文一字未动 ✓;③ digest standing 整段删除,取代裁定原话记在 facets 出处行,分诊誊录职责与四棱块不动 ✓。
• 行数付账:682→678(headroom 4),付源恰为退役文本,无 re-wrap,砍点幸存审计清楚(誊录职责→升级流程步 ③;one-board→多仓规则 5)✓。
• 反向验证(683 行消融红、恢复绿)+ governed-prose 区域核(5 注册面 code span 全存)✓。7 门禁族判定行逐字 ✓。
• 落地后勤(合并时执行):关闭 [Decision digest] maintainer inbox — generated view (please pin) #9822(决策汇总视图,退役完成)。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-warren]

范围收窄裁定(维护者 2026-08-19,PR #9982 合并前,原话):「我感觉决策卡推给我太麻烦了,我需要和ai讨论才能判断,这个还是维持之前的样子。我会定期和ai讨论。」「只有需要我审核的pr 推给我。」

执行(session ae0d8bd1-5667-5f58-8ff8-fa22ec154325):

• 保留:治理面 PR ⇒ review request os-zhuang(四件套 ③)—— 被第二句明示确认;决策汇总视图退役不变(定期讨论走聊天,不复活 digest)。
• 回滚:决策卡 assign os-zhuang 机制整条撤销 —— skills(checklist-test): the documented QA-run title convention matches 0 of 23 real records #9617/finding: SKILL.md's governed-PR fork says "never flip ready", while the devx seat post's standing practice flips governed ADR PRs ready-for-review so the maintainer's merge button works #9900/finding: CLAUDE.md carries no line-ratchet ceiling, while AGENTS.md does — same read path, same governance #9965 已摘指派,决策箱回到原样(箱内待裁,维护者定期与 AI 讨论后裁决,誊录流程不变)。
• PR skills(pm-dispatch): notification handover — review-request and assign os-zhuang, retire the decision digest #9982 已发回 dev 修订(draft 上加 commit,撤状态模型行与升级流程两处 assign/摘指派条款,保留其余),修订后本卡复核补一轮。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-warren]

{
  "issue": 9976,
  "status": "blocked",
  "branch": "claude/issue-9976-notification-handover",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/9982",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Scope-narrowing amendment (PM order, maintainer rulings 2026-08-19: revert edit 2 entirely — decision cards stay chat-worked; keep the governed-PR review-request step grounded by the narrowing quote; keep the digest retirement) is IMPLEMENTED and COMMITTED locally as 288a1df47, all gates green — but the push was REJECTED: PR 9982 is in the merge queue. I did not queue it: I created it as draft and never flipped it; pull_request_read now shows draft:false with head still at the old un-amended commit 6649fc405, and the remote rejection reads 'branches that are queued for merging cannot be updated. To modify this branch, dequeue the associated pull request.' State I did not set belongs to another actor (possibly the maintainer acting on the review-request push he just received; possibly a seat violation of the governed-surface rule) — reverting a ready flip or dequeuing is never mine to do, so I stopped: no dequeue, no draft flip, no push retry loop (policy rejection, not network). Consequence if it lands as-is: the OLD head merges, containing the now-reverted edit 2 (assign/unassign os-zhuang on decision cards); the amendment would then need a follow-up PR from the same branch. The amendment commit is safe on the local branch in worktree /home/user/objectstack-9976b (kept alive, tree clean, branch ref holds the commit regardless).",
  "line_budget": { "before_amendment": 678, "after_amendment": 680, "ceiling": 682, "headroom_after": 2 },
  "amendment_content": "Reverted: state-model needs-user-decision row to pre-PR wording; escalation-flow step-2 assign; step-3 unassign clause. Kept + grounded: ACCEPT fork step 3 gains the narrowing quote 「只有需要我审核的pr 推给我。」; reverting ruling recorded once, compactly, at the facets-block provenance line with full verbatim 「我感觉决策卡推给我太麻烦了,我需要和ai讨论才能判断,这个还是维持之前的样子。我会定期和ai讨论。」. Digest retirement untouched.",
  "tests": "All at amended head 288a1df47, exit codes captured via redirect-then-$?, never through a pipe. dispatch-gates.mjs (no args): same 1-path change set vs merge base 8fa4e2a76, same 7 families, 'Model tier — MANDATORY: claude-fable-5'. Verdicts: check:pm-skill-ratchet '✓ .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 680 lines (ceiling 682; headroom 2).' | check:pm-governed-prose '✓ 2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces … and claim no others.' | check:pm-skill-id-lint '✓ 15 file(s) clean' | check:skill-frame-sync '✓ 4 copies … structurally isomorphic across 3 files' | check:skill-compatibility '✓ 11 SKILL.md file(s) reconciled against 77 workspace packages' | check:doc-authoring '✓ doc authoring guard: 377 files clean' | check:pm-governed-merges --self-test '✓ 77 assertions' | check:doc-formula-expressions '✓ 22 record-scoped formula example(s) … judged clean' (lint dep closure rebuilt first in the fresh worktree, under the shared verify lock).",
  "reverse_verification": "Re-run at amended head. Predicted: 683 lines turns ratchet RED naming the file. Observed: exit 1, '✗ … is 683 lines; the ratchet ceiling is 682.' Restored from committed state, exit 0 at 680, worktree clean.",
  "labels_read_back": ["documentation", "size/s", "skip-changeset"],
  "pr_state_read_back": { "draft": false, "merged": false, "head": "6649fc405", "queue_evidence": "push rejected: branches that are queued for merging cannot be updated", "note": "draft:false was NOT set by this session; PR body still says draft/human-merge-only" },
  "files_changed": [".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md"],
  "open_questions": [
    { "question": "PR 9982 (governed surface) was flipped ready and entered the merge queue by an actor this session cannot identify, while carrying the pre-amendment head. How should the amendment land?", "options": ["A: If the maintainer queued it deliberately — let it land, then this branch's already-committed 288a1df47 goes up as a follow-up governed draft PR (review-request os-zhuang) for the scope-narrowing revert.", "B: If the queue entry is a seat violation — maintainer/PM dequeues (convert to draft per PD-14), I push 288a1df47 onto the same PR immediately; PR then needs its body refresh only.", "C: I dequeue myself — rejected: reverting another actor's ready flip is explicitly never the dev's call."], "recommendation": "A or B strictly on who queued it (read the timeline event actor); the dev-side work is identical and already committed either way." }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": []
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-warren]

入队事件记录 + 处置裁定(skills 座,session ae0d8bd1-5667-5f58-8ff8-fa22ec154325)

PR #9982(治理面,恒 draft)被翻 ready 并入合并队列,head 仍是修订前的 6649fc4(含已被 2026-08-19 收窄裁定撤销的决策卡 assign 半条);修订提交 288a1df 因队列锁推不上去。同时刻队列共五个:9860 → 9890 → 9826 → 9978 → 9982 —— 其中 9860/9890 是 devx 道按设计停放的治理面/扣审 PR。跨车道成批入队只有维护者的手会做(合并即审核,本 PR 成文的机制恰在鼓励这个动作),判定为维护者清 Review-requested 队列,⛔ 不撤队、不逆维护者操作。

处置:A —— #9982 按现 head 落地(其中 edit 2 落地即为死文);落地后 dev 立即从同分支推 288a1df、开后续治理面 draft PR(review request os-zhuang)承载收窄回滚,#9983(四维中文化)串行改排其后。若入队者并非维护者,请维护者见此评论后指正 —— 那将按治理违规处理并审计。

---

Generated by Claude Code