Skip to content

Conversation

@vpk-odoo
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vpk-odoo vpk-odoo added this to the 14.0 milestone May 26, 2021
@vpk-odoo vpk-odoo requested a review from xpl-odoo May 26, 2021 17:15
@vpk-odoo vpk-odoo force-pushed the 14.0-crm-lead-mining-vpk branch from 289be92 to da36d9c Compare May 26, 2021 17:17
Copy link
Contributor

@xpl-odoo xpl-odoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR seems to include your previous PR. I'm not knowledgeable enough so I'm summoning @jcs-odoo to check what's happening :)

==============

For this feature to work, go to :menuselection:`CRM --> Configuration --> Settings` and activate the **Lead Mining** feature.
For this feature to work, go to :menuselection:`CRM --> Configuration --> Settings` and activate
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
For this feature to work, go to :menuselection:`CRM --> Configuration --> Settings` and activate
Go to :menuselection:`CRM --> Configuration --> Settings` and activate

"For this feature to work" seems superfluous. Feel free to keep that little 'intro' if you prefer though :)

=======================
In any business, getting quality leads is essential to keep the business growing. Lead mining allows you to generate leads from scratch directly from your database.
Target your leads based on a set of criteria such as the country, the size of the company, the industry your leads are coming from to make them relevant to your business.
In any business, getting quality leads is essential to keep the business growing. Lead mining
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
In any business, getting quality leads is essential to keep the business growing. Lead mining
For any company, getting quality leads is essential to keep the business growing. Lead mining

Nitpicking, but I would try to avoid repetitions when they aren't necessary (i.e., when you use precise terms to describe Odoo features, fields etc., which of course should not be re-named: ))

Comment on lines 1 to 3
=======================
Lead mining
=======================
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the content guidelines:

For each formatting line (e.g., ===), write as many symbols (=) as there are characters in the header.

Here you can remove 12 equal signs above and below the heading

leads are relevant to your business.

Configuration
==============
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
==============
=============

One too many "="

:alt: Activating Lead Mining

Start generating leads
==========================
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
==========================
======================

Four too many "="

:alt: Buy Credits from Lead Mining Setting

.. image:: media/LM7.png
.. image:: lead_mining/LM7.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a lot of blank space on that screenshot. I would try to use a similar width for both screenshots as they are displayed one after the other

@@ -1,78 +1,79 @@
=============================
Assign leads based on scoring
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure what happened here, but the changes from your first PR are also included here. @jcs-odoo can you check what's going on here?



.. image:: media/LM5.png
.. image:: lead_mining/generate-leads-popup.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't forget to pngquant your screenshots :)

:menuselection:`Leads --> Leads` where you have the **Generate Leads** button.

.. image:: media/LM2.png
.. image:: lead_mining/generate-leads-button.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't forget to pngquant your screenshots :)

Comment on lines +41 to +47
Additional options you can choose from are:
* **Size**: filter leads depending on the number of employees in the companies.
* **Country**: pick the countries leads are coming from. Pick multiple countries, if applicable.
* **Industry**: pick the industries leads are coming from. Pick multiple industries, if applicable.
* **Salesperson**: choose who on the Sales Team will be assigned these leads.
* **Sales Team**: choose which Sales Team will be assigned to these leads
* **Tags**: choose what tags are added directly to the leads once found.
Copy link
Contributor

@xpl-odoo xpl-odoo May 27, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Additional options you can choose from are:
* **Size**: filter leads depending on the number of employees in the companies.
* **Country**: pick the countries leads are coming from. Pick multiple countries, if applicable.
* **Industry**: pick the industries leads are coming from. Pick multiple industries, if applicable.
* **Salesperson**: choose who on the Sales Team will be assigned these leads.
* **Sales Team**: choose which Sales Team will be assigned to these leads
* **Tags**: choose what tags are added directly to the leads once found.
Additional options you can choose from are:
- **Size**: filter leads depending on the number of employees in the companies.
- **Country**: pick the countries leads are coming from. Pick multiple countries, if applicable.
- **Industry**: pick the industries leads are coming from. Pick multiple industries, if applicable.
- **Salesperson**: choose who on the Sales Team will be assigned these leads.
- **Sales Team**: choose which Sales Team will be assigned to these leads
- **Tags**: choose what tags are added directly to the leads once found.

I assume you wanted to have a list here? I think you need to have an empty line before starting a list. I never used *, that's why I replaced them with -, but * should work as well.

@jcs-odoo
Copy link
Contributor

jcs-odoo commented Jun 2, 2021

This PR seems to include your previous PR. I'm not knowledgeable enough so I'm summoning @jcs-odoo to check what's happening :)

not to worry, @xpl-odoo ! git rebase is our best friend in situations like these.

I assume @vpk-odoo, that you based this branch on the previous one, either by mistake, or because you edited the same document in another branch (while the PR wasn't merged yet). So we'll make sure to merge the other PR first, and then, you'll have a good basis to rebase this branch here. There is no real use to do it before that, since you'll have to rebase on a "usable" 14.0 if you want your PR to be applicable.

Now, I'll explain in videos how to do this, as I think you never had to resolve conflicts before. (no worries, it's really normal as well)

So I focus first on the other PR so we can have a clean base here :)

@jcs-odoo jcs-odoo requested a review from a team December 9, 2021 11:37
@StraubCreative
Copy link
Contributor

Follow up on this @jcs-odoo @xpl-odoo

The PR seems out-of-date and VPK no longer active.
@meng-odoo and I would like to take it over.

For how we may proceed, which path do you recommend we follow:

  • we submit a new PR off a fresh 14.0 pull, and cherry-pick VPK's edits on top of it along with XPL's change requests
    OR
  • stay on this PR, rebase 14.0, solve the merge conflicts, and address change requests here (think this depends on the status of the previous PR which was closed and then reopened?)

Thanks and please let us know 🙏

@StraubCreative StraubCreative self-assigned this Apr 22, 2022
@AntoineVDV
Copy link
Collaborator

@StraubCreative Hi, both are okay. It's like for task: it depends on whether you find it easier to do a fresh start or not, want to keep the review history or not, etc. From a git point of view, the same commit is going to be merged at the end either way.

StraubCreative added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
@StraubCreative
Copy link
Contributor

Continuing this PR as cherry-pick on #2535.
Closing thread.

@robodoo
Copy link
Collaborator

robodoo commented Jul 31, 2022

Sorry, I didn't know about this PR and had to retrieve its information, you may have to re-approve it.

@robodoo
Copy link
Collaborator

robodoo commented Jul 31, 2022

samueljlieber pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
samueljlieber pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
samueljlieber pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
samueljlieber pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
samueljlieber pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
StraubCreative added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

closes #2535

Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
fw-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

X-original-commit: 02ef871
StraubCreative added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

X-original-commit: 02ef871
robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

closes #3118

X-original-commit: 02ef871
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
fw-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

X-original-commit: 2416a2e
fw-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

X-original-commit: 2416a2e
fw-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

X-original-commit: 2416a2e
fw-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

X-original-commit: 2416a2e
robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

closes #3128

X-original-commit: 2416a2e
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Zachary Straub <zst@odoo.com>
robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

closes #3130

X-original-commit: 2416a2e
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Zachary Straub <zst@odoo.com>
robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

closes #3129

X-original-commit: 2416a2e
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Zachary Straub <zst@odoo.com>
robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Task: 2543815
Cherry pick from #998

Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary.

What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files.

On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes:

- renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png)
- cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.)
- rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.

closes #3131

X-original-commit: 2416a2e
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Zachary Straub <zst@odoo.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants