-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.6k
[IMP] CRM: updating flow and screenshots about lead mining #998
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
289be92 to
da36d9c
Compare
xpl-odoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR seems to include your previous PR. I'm not knowledgeable enough so I'm summoning @jcs-odoo to check what's happening :)
| ============== | ||
|
|
||
| For this feature to work, go to :menuselection:`CRM --> Configuration --> Settings` and activate the **Lead Mining** feature. | ||
| For this feature to work, go to :menuselection:`CRM --> Configuration --> Settings` and activate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| For this feature to work, go to :menuselection:`CRM --> Configuration --> Settings` and activate | |
| Go to :menuselection:`CRM --> Configuration --> Settings` and activate |
"For this feature to work" seems superfluous. Feel free to keep that little 'intro' if you prefer though :)
| ======================= | ||
| In any business, getting quality leads is essential to keep the business growing. Lead mining allows you to generate leads from scratch directly from your database. | ||
| Target your leads based on a set of criteria such as the country, the size of the company, the industry your leads are coming from to make them relevant to your business. | ||
| In any business, getting quality leads is essential to keep the business growing. Lead mining |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| In any business, getting quality leads is essential to keep the business growing. Lead mining | |
| For any company, getting quality leads is essential to keep the business growing. Lead mining |
Nitpicking, but I would try to avoid repetitions when they aren't necessary (i.e., when you use precise terms to describe Odoo features, fields etc., which of course should not be re-named: ))
| ======================= | ||
| Lead mining | ||
| ======================= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From the content guidelines:
For each formatting line (e.g., ===), write as many symbols (=) as there are characters in the header.
Here you can remove 12 equal signs above and below the heading
| leads are relevant to your business. | ||
|
|
||
| Configuration | ||
| ============== |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| ============== | |
| ============= |
One too many "="
| :alt: Activating Lead Mining | ||
|
|
||
| Start generating leads | ||
| ========================== |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| ========================== | |
| ====================== |
Four too many "="
| :alt: Buy Credits from Lead Mining Setting | ||
|
|
||
| .. image:: media/LM7.png | ||
| .. image:: lead_mining/LM7.png |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a lot of blank space on that screenshot. I would try to use a similar width for both screenshots as they are displayed one after the other
| @@ -1,78 +1,79 @@ | |||
| ============================= | |||
| Assign leads based on scoring | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
|
||
|
|
||
| .. image:: media/LM5.png | ||
| .. image:: lead_mining/generate-leads-popup.png |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't forget to pngquant your screenshots :)
| :menuselection:`Leads --> Leads` where you have the **Generate Leads** button. | ||
|
|
||
| .. image:: media/LM2.png | ||
| .. image:: lead_mining/generate-leads-button.png |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't forget to pngquant your screenshots :)
| Additional options you can choose from are: | ||
| * **Size**: filter leads depending on the number of employees in the companies. | ||
| * **Country**: pick the countries leads are coming from. Pick multiple countries, if applicable. | ||
| * **Industry**: pick the industries leads are coming from. Pick multiple industries, if applicable. | ||
| * **Salesperson**: choose who on the Sales Team will be assigned these leads. | ||
| * **Sales Team**: choose which Sales Team will be assigned to these leads | ||
| * **Tags**: choose what tags are added directly to the leads once found. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| Additional options you can choose from are: | |
| * **Size**: filter leads depending on the number of employees in the companies. | |
| * **Country**: pick the countries leads are coming from. Pick multiple countries, if applicable. | |
| * **Industry**: pick the industries leads are coming from. Pick multiple industries, if applicable. | |
| * **Salesperson**: choose who on the Sales Team will be assigned these leads. | |
| * **Sales Team**: choose which Sales Team will be assigned to these leads | |
| * **Tags**: choose what tags are added directly to the leads once found. | |
| Additional options you can choose from are: | |
| - **Size**: filter leads depending on the number of employees in the companies. | |
| - **Country**: pick the countries leads are coming from. Pick multiple countries, if applicable. | |
| - **Industry**: pick the industries leads are coming from. Pick multiple industries, if applicable. | |
| - **Salesperson**: choose who on the Sales Team will be assigned these leads. | |
| - **Sales Team**: choose which Sales Team will be assigned to these leads | |
| - **Tags**: choose what tags are added directly to the leads once found. |
I assume you wanted to have a list here? I think you need to have an empty line before starting a list. I never used *, that's why I replaced them with -, but * should work as well.
not to worry, @xpl-odoo ! I assume @vpk-odoo, that you based this branch on the previous one, either by mistake, or because you edited the same document in another branch (while the PR wasn't merged yet). So we'll make sure to merge the other PR first, and then, you'll have a good basis to rebase this branch here. There is no real use to do it before that, since you'll have to rebase on a "usable" 14.0 if you want your PR to be applicable. Now, I'll explain in videos how to do this, as I think you never had to resolve conflicts before. (no worries, it's really normal as well) So I focus first on the other PR so we can have a clean base here :) |
|
Follow up on this @jcs-odoo @xpl-odoo The PR seems out-of-date and VPK no longer active. For how we may proceed, which path do you recommend we follow:
Thanks and please let us know 🙏 |
|
@StraubCreative Hi, both are okay. It's like for task: it depends on whether you find it easier to do a fresh start or not, want to keep the review history or not, etc. From a git point of view, the same commit is going to be merged at the end either way. |
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
|
Continuing this PR as cherry-pick on #2535. |
|
Sorry, I didn't know about this PR and had to retrieve its information, you may have to re-approve it. |
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made.
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. closes #2535 Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. X-original-commit: 02ef871
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. X-original-commit: 02ef871
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. closes #3118 X-original-commit: 02ef871 Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. X-original-commit: 2416a2e
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. X-original-commit: 2416a2e
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. X-original-commit: 2416a2e
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. X-original-commit: 2416a2e
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. closes #3128 X-original-commit: 2416a2e Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com> Signed-off-by: Zachary Straub <zst@odoo.com>
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. closes #3130 X-original-commit: 2416a2e Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com> Signed-off-by: Zachary Straub <zst@odoo.com>
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. closes #3129 X-original-commit: 2416a2e Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com> Signed-off-by: Zachary Straub <zst@odoo.com>
Task: 2543815 Cherry pick from #998 Omitted changes proposed in the **track_leads** directory (e.g. `lead_scoring.rst` + image folder). Both the content and image updates were already pushed from another PR so what was proposed on #998 was outdated and no longer necessary. What’s left over are the original proposed changes in #998, within the **acquire_leads** directory which include updates to `lead_mining.rst` and corresponding image files. On top of these proposals, I went ahead and made the following changes: - renamed the image files in the asset directory, since they were using outdated naming convention (e.g. LM1.png, LM6.png, LM7.png) - cleaned up rst formatting issues (headings, line breaks, added guilabels, etc.) - rewrote document so content was more concise + followed content guidelines. You can see the first version of proposals here to compare the changes made. closes #3131 X-original-commit: 2416a2e Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com> Signed-off-by: Zachary Straub <zst@odoo.com>
No description provided.