Skip to content

Conversation

@clbarnes
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Automated Review URLs

joshmoore
joshmoore previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2025
@joshmoore joshmoore merged commit d1dff7c into ome:main Dec 18, 2025
9 checks passed
Comment on lines +28 to +34
The recommendations made by the RFC (zarr.json at the root, sorted metadata files)
are valuable to all single-file Zarr users,
and the only OME-Zarr specific elements are arbitrary markers
(the ZIP comment and file extension).
While no readers are currently optimised for sorted metadata reads,
exposing a larger community to that access pattern makes it more likely that one will eventually be written.
Would it be possible to submit this meta-format as e.g. a [zarr convention](https://zarr.dev/conventions/), with more generic markers?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would want to consider what other markers may be useful before progressing to the Zarr level. I simplified from three markers down to one marker when clarifying the comment. Those markers may still yet have utility, but I have not clearly demonstrated them yet.

It might be good to gain further experience before generalizing to Zarr itself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants