v1.10: fortran: Fix many Fortran binding bugs #1084
Conversation
Though the `MPI_DUP_FN` subroutine is depricated, it is not yet removed as of MPI-3.1. (cherry picked from commit open-mpi/ompi@10c11ff)
Same order for `comm`, `type`, and `win`. No code change. (cherry picked from commit open-mpi/ompi@334c63c)
And insert necessary empty lines and remove unnecessary empty lines. No code change. (cherry picked from commit open-mpi/ompi@96e93a9)
(cherry picked from commit open-mpi/ompi@b6cb0bc)
(cherry picked from commit open-mpi/ompi@f3b9a49)
(cherry picked from commit open-mpi/ompi@6f09d53)
(cherry picked from commit open-mpi/ompi@5d32a60)
|
@kawashima-fj Compared to #1083, this PR seems incomplete...? |
(backproted from commit open-mpi/ompi@d48c852)
This commit adds the following symbols MPI_Alloc_mem_cptr_f MPI_Alloc_mem_cptr_f08 PMPI_Alloc_mem_cptr_f PMPI_Alloc_mem_cptr_f08 These are implemented in the same way as other `_cptr` routines. (backported from commit open-mpi/ompi@17d32ac)
|
@jsquyres Sorry, I added 2 commits which had conflicts. Please review again. |
|
Test PASSed. |
|
Test PASSed. |
|
@kawashima-fj Ah, I just noticed that you added the new commits. Sorry -- I missed the mail (I get too much per day... 😦 ), and the "pushed-back" label was still on this PR). Pro tip: once you address review comments brought up in a PR, you can remove the "pushed-back" label to let the reviewer know that it's ready to review again, like this: bot:nolabel:pushed-back |
|
👍 |
5 participants
PR for v1.10.3
@jsquyres please review
bot:label:bug
bot:milestone:v1.10.3
Not critical; can be delayed to v1.10.4
(cherry picked from part of commit open-mpi/ompi@4566286)