You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Each new @codex mention on a pull request starts a new Codex task/session. During an iterative review cycle, this fragments context and creates repeated tasks.
Proposal
Add an optional “one persistent session per pull request” mode for Codex GitHub code review:
Key the session by repository + PR number.
Reuse the same Codex task for subsequent @codex comments on that PR.
Serialize concurrent events for the same PR and deduplicate repeated webhook/comment events.
Refresh the PR head SHA, review threads, and CI status on each turn.
Archive the task when the PR is closed or merged, and create a replacement only when the original expires or is archived.
Make the behavior configurable per repository/workspace, with an opt-out if needed.
Benefit
This would preserve context across review iterations, reduce duplicated setup and token overhead, and make the review → fix → re-review workflow more coherent.
Using the same comment thread or enabling Automatic reviews can help, but neither provides one persistent conversational task for the PR.
Could this be considered for Codex GitHub integration? If there is an existing setting, related discussion, or tracking item, please link it.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Problem
Each new @codex mention on a pull request starts a new Codex task/session. During an iterative review cycle, this fragments context and creates repeated tasks.
Proposal
Add an optional “one persistent session per pull request” mode for Codex GitHub code review:
Benefit
This would preserve context across review iterations, reduce duplicated setup and token overhead, and make the review → fix → re-review workflow more coherent.
Using the same comment thread or enabling Automatic reviews can help, but neither provides one persistent conversational task for the PR.
Could this be considered for Codex GitHub integration? If there is an existing setting, related discussion, or tracking item, please link it.
All reactions