I’m reporting a reproducible workflow issue that makes Codex unreliable for real developer automation.
In my normal terminal, zsh + op + glab work correctly (same directory, same hooks, same token resolution).
In Codex-run commands, even with login/interactive zsh attempts, the environment is different:
1Password desktop app integration is not reliably available
op://-based secret loading behaves differently
glab resolves to a different auth context than in my actual terminal
group/project access checks fail in Codex while succeeding locally
This leads to repeated failures and manual copy/paste fallbacks, which defeats the purpose of agent automation.
Expected behavior
Codex should be able to run in the exact same effective shell/session context as the user’s terminal (including keychain/app bridges and shell hooks), or
clearly expose a “true user session mode” for auth-sensitive developer workflows.
I’m reporting a reproducible workflow issue that makes Codex unreliable for real developer automation.
In my normal terminal, zsh + op + glab work correctly (same directory, same hooks, same token resolution).
In Codex-run commands, even with login/interactive zsh attempts, the environment is different:
1Password desktop app integration is not reliably available
op://-based secret loading behaves differently
glab resolves to a different auth context than in my actual terminal
group/project access checks fail in Codex while succeeding locally
This leads to repeated failures and manual copy/paste fallbacks, which defeats the purpose of agent automation.
Expected behavior
Codex should be able to run in the exact same effective shell/session context as the user’s terminal (including keychain/app bridges and shell hooks), or
clearly expose a “true user session mode” for auth-sensitive developer workflows.