Skip to content

"Ehh... Alright" option for inconsequential bugs found on pull requests #13992

@hejner

Description

@hejner

What variant of Codex are you using?

Web

What feature would you like to see?

Currently, we've only got thumbs up and thumbs down, which means "You were correct, this is a bug" or "You are wrong, this isn't a bug", but I feel like Codex keeps finding "bugs" that no user will experience. It's not exactly false positives but it's really inconsequential. The confused emoji could be considered? 😕

This would give OpenAI some more training data for the kind of meaningless bugs that seems to be the biggest issue with AI Pull Request reviews. From my experience, at least half of the bugs found are like this.

Additional information

An example, is that I have a task duration parser that parses hours + minutes for tasks that usually takes less than an hour. Sure, it's a possible bug that it doesn't handle tasks that takes more than 99 hours, but I've not met a lot of people willing to work continuously for that long. Usually it would be spread out over several tasks done on different days.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    code-reviewIssues relating to code reviews performed by codexcodex-webIssues related to Codex WebenhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions