Are you dense? Put 5.4 Thinking and Pro on Codex connected to our subscription your marketing is deceiving.

[topemalheiro]

What variant of Codex are you using?

Doesn't matter

What feature would you like to see?

...

Additional information

If I knew we only get access to them in ChatGPT web/app, I would've never subscribed. Your marketing should be clear, or you gotta put that there like yesterday, I'm thinking about refunding now.

No response

[github-actions]

Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.

• Token Usage for CLI 0.118.0 reported as "Other" #16610
• my account has 'free tier' limits, when i'm on 'plus' plan. #16261
• Codex Upgrade to Pro is Completely Broken on VS Code #16453
• ■ {"detail":"The 'GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark' model is not supported when using Codex with a ChatGPT account."} #15648

Powered by Codex Action

[topemalheiro]

Look at what I gotta do just to code with your best models properly: https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1rlqsj9/imagine_gpt_54_pro_on_codex/
Have the decency and professionalism to facilitate the programmers that buy your product, smh.

[etraut-openai]

The Pro model is not designed to be used for agentic or coding use cases. It's intended for deep research.

For a detailed list of OpenAI models that are supported in Codex, refer to this documentation.

[topemalheiro]

The Pro model is not designed to be used for agentic or coding use cases. It's intended for deep research.

For a detailed list of OpenAI models that are supported in Codex, refer to this documentation.

Wow, a reply from an AI company. Thanks!