What version of Codex CLI is running?
0.125.0
Which model were you using?
gpt-5.5
What platform is your computer?
WSL2
What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?
Windows Terminal
What issue are you seeing?
When Codex integrates with the GPT-5.5 model, its cache hit rate is very low, which causes costs to be consumed rapidly.
In contrast, OpenCode integrated with GPT-5.5 has no such problem and maintains a high cache hit rate.
Besides, Codex paired with GPT-5.4 also achieves a high cache hit rate normally.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
We tested Codex integrated with GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5 respectively. By checking the session logs of both versions, we can see there is a significant difference in the frequency of cached_input_tokens.
What is the expected behavior?
The expected behavior is that Codex with GPT-5.5 should maintain a normal high cache hit rate, consistent with the performance of Codex + GPT-5.4 and OpenCode + GPT-5.5, to avoid excessive and rapid cost consumption.
Additional information
No response
What version of Codex CLI is running?
0.125.0
Which model were you using?
gpt-5.5
What platform is your computer?
WSL2
What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?
Windows Terminal
What issue are you seeing?
When Codex integrates with the GPT-5.5 model, its cache hit rate is very low, which causes costs to be consumed rapidly.
In contrast, OpenCode integrated with GPT-5.5 has no such problem and maintains a high cache hit rate.
Besides, Codex paired with GPT-5.4 also achieves a high cache hit rate normally.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
We tested Codex integrated with GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5 respectively. By checking the session logs of both versions, we can see there is a significant difference in the frequency of cached_input_tokens.
What is the expected behavior?
The expected behavior is that Codex with GPT-5.5 should maintain a normal high cache hit rate, consistent with the performance of Codex + GPT-5.4 and OpenCode + GPT-5.5, to avoid excessive and rapid cost consumption.
Additional information
No response