I regularly check the release notes of codex, and often find some versions are skipped when a stable release is published.
For example, the next stable version after 0.125.0 is 0.128.0; 0.126.0 and 0.127.0 were skipped.
Regarding this, I have two questions:
-
Just out of curiosity, why do you sometimes skip some version numbers? This is a bit inconvenient because I usually compare the latest version number with the local one to estimate how far behind I am.
-
More importantly, when you release the version $N + M$ after the version $N$, skipping $N + 1,\ N + 2,\ \cdots,\ N + M - 1$, can we expect that the release note of the version $N+M$ contains all changes since the version $N$, not just the changes since $N + M - 1$?
I regularly check the release notes of
codex, and often find some versions are skipped when a stable release is published.For example, the next stable version after
0.125.0is0.128.0;0.126.0and0.127.0were skipped.Regarding this, I have two questions:
Just out of curiosity, why do you sometimes skip some version numbers? This is a bit inconvenient because I usually compare the latest version number with the local one to estimate how far behind I am.
More importantly, when you release the version$N + M$ after the version $N$ , skipping $N + 1,\ N + 2,\ \cdots,\ N + M - 1$ , can we expect that the release note of the version $N+M$ contains all changes since the version $N$ , not just the changes since $N + M - 1$ ?