mcp: surface profile migration guidance under --profile#23890
Conversation
jif-oai
changed the title
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e26a35e253
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
jif-oai
changed the title
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d9f1e9811b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
1 participant
Why
codex --profile <name> mcp ...should reach the same profile-v2 migration guard as runtime commands. Otherwise legacy[profiles.<name>]users see the generic command-scope rejection instead of the existing guidance to move settings into$CODEX_HOME/<name>.config.toml.What
codex mcpthrough the--profilesubcommand gate.codex --profile work mcp list.Testing
cargo test -p codex-cli