fix: accept custom request hash in RBS - #554
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Castiron custom code✅ No new custom-code files detected. 47 mixed files remain; 0 existing customizations changed. Compared 47 existing customizations unchanged
7 more in the full report. A changed generated baseline means this report cannot reliably identify which handwritten lines changed. Inspect the custom-code diffDownload the exact patch produced by this run (requires repository access): gh run download 33276046691 --repo openai/openai-ruby \
--name castiron-custom-code-33276046691-1 --dir /tmp/castiron-custom-code-33276046691-1
git apply --stat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-33276046691-1/custom-code.patch
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-33276046691-1/custom-code.patchOr reproduce it from an SDK checkout containing the vendored reporter: git fetch --no-tags origin f8b128cf0db3198a297caec7e7ca8dfa991f16e8 02dc42368c961ac1b44c9c494d53f39070d603a1
python3 scripts/castiron/custom_code_report.py report \
--base f8b128cf0db3198a297caec7e7ca8dfa991f16e8 \
--head 02dc42368c961ac1b44c9c494d53f39070d603a1 --fetch --require-head-hash --public \
--out /tmp/castiron-custom-code-02dc42368c96
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-02dc42368c96/custom-code.patchThis is the current full custom patch for mixed files, not an attribution of only the handwritten lines changed by this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: caad85c772
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c544dd8430
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
HAYDEN-OAI
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed a7003bc. No substantive findings. The request signature now matches the runtime's single request hash, including documented symbol/string query and header keys. The security hash models the recognized authentication keys with boolean flag values, without the previous empty-record union.
Static implementation review only.
a7003bc to
02dc423
Compare
Summary
Scope
Verification
Adversarial review