Skip to content

10L XSA + EMA + Partial RoPE + LN Scale (val_bpb: 1.1365)#458

Open
ofirkris wants to merge 5 commits intoopenai:mainfrom
ofirkris:tap-mobile-submission
Open

10L XSA + EMA + Partial RoPE + LN Scale (val_bpb: 1.1365)#458
ofirkris wants to merge 5 commits intoopenai:mainfrom
ofirkris:tap-mobile-submission

Conversation

@ofirkris
Copy link

Results

Seed val_bpb Artifact Steps
42 1.1365 15,759,319 6491
1337 1.1366 15,820,386 6520
  • 8xH100 SXM, 600s, 92ms/step
  • PyTorch 2.7.0 + FlashAttention 2.8.3
  • No TTT, no test-time adaptation

Techniques

10L 512d, 3x MLP, XSA last 4 layers, EMA 0.997, Partial RoPE 16/64, LN Scale,
SmearGate, BigramHash(10240), Int5 MLP / Int6 attn, FP16 embeds, 3.2% pruning, zstd-22,
sliding window eval stride=64

@mohosy
Copy link

mohosy commented Mar 23, 2026

partial rope is interesting havent seen that in many submissions yet. how many dims did you find works best? 16 seems low but if it works it works

@ofirkris
Copy link
Author

partial rope is interesting havent seen that in many submissions yet. how many dims did you find works best? 16 seems low but if it works it works

I tested 16 out of 64 dims (25%) based on ablations from other competitive runs on this challenge.

The intuition is that most heads don't need full positional information - leaving 48 dims position-free lets them learn content-based attention patterns.
I didn't sweep extensively (tried 0, 16, 32, 64) and 16 gave the best result on my setup. Would be interesting to see if anyone finds a different sweet spot at larger layer counts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants