Skip to content

Conversation

@matthugs
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (b8139aa) 100.00% compared to head (32f28e6) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #276   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           16        16           
  Lines          436       436           
  Branches        47        47           
=========================================
  Hits           436       436           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@matthugs matthugs requested a review from a team April 24, 2023 19:57
-c constraints.txt

codecov # Code coverage reporting
coverage # Calculate code coverage of tests.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ci.in should only pull in tox and tox-battery -- tox manages its own virtualenv where it pulls in coverage (via test.txt I believe).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(so this line should just be deleted)

@timmc-edx
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, it looks like Feanil beat you to it: #274

@matthugs
Copy link
Author

Indeed @feanil did! Thanks @timmc-edx & Feanil!

@matthugs matthugs closed this Apr 24, 2023
@matthugs matthugs deleted the matthugs/remove-codecov-dependency branch April 24, 2023 22:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants