Skip to content

Fix access to tp register for LLVM in syscalls.c #2791

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
JeanRochCoulon merged 8 commits into from
May 23, 2025
Merged

Fix access to tp register for LLVM in syscalls.c #2791

JeanRochCoulon merged 8 commits into from
May 23, 2025

Conversation

@math-gout
Copy link
Contributor

@math-gout math-gout commented Feb 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

The old syntax for accessing the tp register was not recognised by LLVM. This PR fixes that.

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Local-Register-Variables.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Global-Register-Variables.html

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 26, 2025

❌ failed run, report available here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2025

❌ failed run, report available here.

@JeanRochCoulon
Copy link
Contributor

JeanRochCoulon commented Feb 28, 2025

I updated the bench results to make the CI pass, but why bench are faster? This modification should not impact them so much

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 28, 2025

❌ failed run, report available here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2025

❌ failed run, report available here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2025

❌ failed run, report available here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 6, 2025

👋 Hi there!

This pull request seems inactive. Need more help or have updates? Feel free to let us know. If there are no updates within the next few days, we'll go ahead and close this PR. 😊

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status:Stale Issue or PR is stale and hasn't received any updates. label Apr 6, 2025
@JeanRochCoulon JeanRochCoulon removed the Status:Stale Issue or PR is stale and hasn't received any updates. label Apr 6, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 7, 2025

👋 Hi there!

This pull request seems inactive. Need more help or have updates? Feel free to let us know. If there are no updates within the next few days, we'll go ahead and close this PR. 😊

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status:Stale Issue or PR is stale and hasn't received any updates. label May 7, 2025
@JeanRochCoulon JeanRochCoulon removed the Status:Stale Issue or PR is stale and hasn't received any updates. label May 11, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 23, 2025

❌ failed run, report available here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 23, 2025

✔️ successful run, report available here.

@JeanRochCoulon JeanRochCoulon merged commit 86ad99f into openhwgroup:master May 23, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@JeanRochCoulon JeanRochCoulon Awaiting requested review from JeanRochCoulon JeanRochCoulon is a code owner

@zarubaf zarubaf Awaiting requested review from zarubaf

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@math-gout @JeanRochCoulon