Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8335367: [s390] Add support for load immediate on condition instructions. #22058

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mmatti-sw
Copy link
Contributor

@mmatti-sw mmatti-sw commented Nov 13, 2024

Add support for load immediate on condition instructions.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Warning

 ⚠️ Found trailing period in issue title for 8335367: [s390] Add support for load immediate on condition instructions.

Issue

  • JDK-8335367: [s390] Add support for load immediate on condition instructions. (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22058/head:pull/22058
$ git checkout pull/22058

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22058
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22058/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22058

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22058

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22058.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 13, 2024

👋 Welcome back mmatti-sw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 13, 2024

@mmatti-sw This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8335367: [s390] Add support for load immediate on condition instructions.

Reviewed-by: lucy, amitkumar

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 569 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@offamitkumar, @RealLucy) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8335367 8335367: [s390] Add support for load immediate on condition instructions. Nov 13, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 13, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 13, 2024

@mmatti-sw The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 13, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@offamitkumar offamitkumar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor nits to do, otherwise looks good.

Update the comments as suggested by Amit Kumar

Co-authored-by: Amit Kumar <amitlocham09@icloud.com>
@offamitkumar
Copy link
Member

macOs build failures not related.

@RealLucy free to give a review on this one ?

@@ -3287,7 +3287,7 @@ void MacroAssembler::lookup_secondary_supers_table(Register r_sub_klass,
z_bru(L_done); // pass whatever result we got from a slow path

bind(L_failure);
// TODO: use load immediate on condition and z_bru above will not be required

z_lghi(r_result, 1);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This lghi deserves a conversion to locghi. Furthermore, without checking for feature availability, the code will require z13 or newer. Is that intended?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, actually that was my intention but then I find out that codepath which jumps to L_failure not comes with setting cc to 2.

  testbit(r_array_index, 63);
  z_bfalse(L_failure);
  testbit(r_bitmap, (bit + 1) & Klass::SECONDARY_SUPERS_TABLE_MASK);
  z_bfalse(L_failure);

So other solution which I could think of is, to assume that search will fail and load 1 at the start

  // Initialize r_result with 0 (indicating success). If searching fails, r_result will be loaded
  // with 1 (failure) at the end of this method.
  clear_reg(r_result, true /* whole_reg */, false /* set_cc */); // r_result = 0

But then I remembered this: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/19544/files#r1660693537

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So other solution which I could think of is, to assume that search will fail and load 1 at the start

with this we can now look for CC = EQ. And use z_locghi(result, 0, Assembler::bcondEqual);

Also now logic for secondary supers table for c1 & interpreter assumes that search will fail and loads 1 at the start. So to be in sync, better we keep it this way :)

@mmatti-sw mmatti-sw requested a review from RealLucy December 4, 2024 05:30
Copy link
Contributor

@RealLucy RealLucy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2024

⚠️ @mmatti-sw the full name on your profile does not match the author name in this pull requests' HEAD commit. If this pull request gets integrated then the author name from this pull requests' HEAD commit will be used for the resulting commit. If you wish to push a new commit with a different author name, then please run the following commands in a local repository of your personal fork:

$ git checkout load_imm_on_cond
$ git commit --author='Preferred Full Name <you@example.com>' --allow-empty -m 'Update full name'
$ git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 4, 2024
@mmatti-sw
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Dec 10, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2024

@mmatti-sw
Your change (at version 9f5f396) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@RealLucy
Copy link
Contributor

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Going to push as commit 25d9deb.
Since your change was applied there have been 572 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a6277bb: 8340212: -Xshare:off -XX:CompressedClassSpaceBaseAddress=0x40001000000 crashes on macos-aarch64
  • 165fd84: 8342987: Update --release 24 symbol information for JDK 24 build 27
  • 06c44dd: 8345465: Fix performance regression on x64 after JDK-8345120
  • 2979806: 8345795: Update copyright year to 2024 for hotspot in files where it was missed
  • 7e73c43: 8345217: Parallel: Refactor PSParallelCompact::next_src_region
  • 7d3a404: 8339019: Obsolete the UseLinuxPosixThreadCPUClocks flag
  • a606836: 8345744: Use C++ LINK_TYPE with SetupBuildLauncher in StaticLibs.gmk
  • fe0173d: 8345803: Update copyright year to 2024 for security in files where it was missed
  • 2207749: 8344629: SSLSocketNoServerHelloClientShutdown test timeout
  • 0b9e749: 8345390: [ubsan] systemDictionaryShared.cpp:964: member call on null pointer
  • ... and 562 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/c78de7bf5fc5a4da50c6c64e181abf02a5b12630...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 10, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 10, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Dec 10, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2024

@RealLucy @mmatti-sw Pushed as commit 25d9deb.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants