-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8335367: [s390] Add support for load immediate on condition instructions. #22058
Conversation
👋 Welcome back mmatti-sw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@mmatti-sw This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 569 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@offamitkumar, @RealLucy) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
@mmatti-sw The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
minor nits to do, otherwise looks good.
Update the comments as suggested by Amit Kumar Co-authored-by: Amit Kumar <amitlocham09@icloud.com>
macOs build failures not related. @RealLucy free to give a review on this one ? |
@@ -3287,7 +3287,7 @@ void MacroAssembler::lookup_secondary_supers_table(Register r_sub_klass, | |||
z_bru(L_done); // pass whatever result we got from a slow path | |||
|
|||
bind(L_failure); | |||
// TODO: use load immediate on condition and z_bru above will not be required | |||
|
|||
z_lghi(r_result, 1); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This lghi deserves a conversion to locghi. Furthermore, without checking for feature availability, the code will require z13 or newer. Is that intended?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, actually that was my intention but then I find out that codepath which jumps to L_failure
not comes with setting cc to 2.
testbit(r_array_index, 63);
z_bfalse(L_failure);
testbit(r_bitmap, (bit + 1) & Klass::SECONDARY_SUPERS_TABLE_MASK);
z_bfalse(L_failure);
So other solution which I could think of is, to assume that search will fail and load 1
at the start
// Initialize r_result with 0 (indicating success). If searching fails, r_result will be loaded
// with 1 (failure) at the end of this method.
clear_reg(r_result, true /* whole_reg */, false /* set_cc */); // r_result = 0
But then I remembered this: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/19544/files#r1660693537
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So other solution which I could think of is, to assume that search will fail and load 1 at the start
with this we can now look for CC = EQ
. And use z_locghi(result, 0, Assembler::bcondEqual);
Also now logic for secondary supers table for c1 & interpreter assumes that search will fail and loads 1 at the start. So to be in sync, better we keep it this way :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
|
/integrate |
@mmatti-sw |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 25d9deb.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RealLucy @mmatti-sw Pushed as commit 25d9deb. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Add support for load immediate on condition instructions.
Progress
Warning
8335367: [s390] Add support for load immediate on condition instructions.
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22058/head:pull/22058
$ git checkout pull/22058
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22058
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22058/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22058
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22058
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22058.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment