New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8268727: Remove unused slowpath locking method in OptoRuntime #4490
Conversation
|
@miao-zheng The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
/test |
@miao-zheng you need to get approval to run the tests in tier1 for commits up until 94db2f5 |
Could someone help to review this change? Thanks. |
/label add hotspot-compiler |
@dholmes-ora |
@dholmes-ora |
Redirecting to the compiler team. |
test/lib/sun/hotspot/WhiteBox.java
Outdated
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ public void makeMethodNotCompilable(Executable method, int compLevel, | |||
makeMethodNotCompilable0(method, compLevel, isOsr); | |||
} | |||
public int getMethodCompilationLevel(Executable method) { | |||
return getMethodCompilationLevel(method, false /*not ost*/); | |||
return getMethodCompilationLevel(method, false /*not osr*/); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change is unrelated, should be fixed in a separate CR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a small typo fix, can I merge it in this patch?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the convention is "no"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it. Thanks for your review. I have removed this change.
/test |
Could not create test job |
Looks good, and trivial. It's strange that some pre-commit tests failed on Windows.
|
@miao-zheng This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 117 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@zhengyu123, @dean-long) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.
|
The same test cases fail in other Pull requests on windows, for example: #4534. |
I agree, test failures seem unrelated to this change. |
@dean-long @zhengyu123 Thanks for your review. |
/integrate |
@miao-zheng |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit ae3eedc.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@huishi-hs @miao-zheng Pushed as commit ae3eedc. |
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4490/head:pull/4490
$ git checkout pull/4490
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4490
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4490/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4490
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4490
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4490.diff