Skip to content

Conversation

@parttimenerd
Copy link

@parttimenerd parttimenerd commented Dec 2, 2025

Backport of code that improves the queue sizing of the CPU time sampler (dynamic vs the previous static approach).


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8366082 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8366082: Improve queue size computation in CPU-time sampler (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/44/head:pull/44
$ git checkout pull/44

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/44
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/44/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 44

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 44

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/44.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 2, 2025

👋 Welcome back jbechberger! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 2, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 002f936ef21943ff1c8c03618091793768e756ac 8366082: Improve queue size computation in CPU-time sampler Dec 2, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 2, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Dec 2, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 2, 2025

⚠️ @parttimenerd This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Webrevs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant