Skip to content

make output of rijn example a bit nicer #815

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
janvanrijn merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2019
Merged

make output of rijn example a bit nicer #815

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions examples/40_paper/2018_kdd_rijn_example.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -112,7 +112,6 @@
if len(setups_evals[c].unique()) > 1 or c == performance_column]]
# We are done with processing ``setups_evals``. Note that we still might have some irrelevant hyperparameters, e.g.,
# ``random_state``. We have dropped some relevant hyperparameters, i.e., several categoricals. Let's check it out:
print(setups_evals.dtypes)

# determine x values to pass to fanova library
parameter_names = [pname for pname in setups_evals.columns.to_numpy() if pname != performance_column]
Expand All @@ -121,7 +120,7 @@
for idx, pname in enumerate(parameter_names):
try:
fanova_results.append({
'hyperparameter': pname if len(pname) < 35 else '[...] %s' % pname[-30:],
'hyperparameter': pname.split(".")[-1],
'fanova': evaluator.quantify_importance([idx])[(idx,)]['individual importance']
})
except RuntimeError as e:
Expand Down