climate-processor workflow (AR6)#52
Conversation
znichollscr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice, definitely getting there. A bit of clean up to do. Again, we can either do that, then merge everything, or we can merge first, then go straight to getting the ScenarioMIP workflow into gcages, then clean up after. Depends on how much time pressure is on you
|
I must be doing something wrong with the MAGICC configuration. The scm output gives different values from what the original climate-processor gives. |
What command/test are you running that shows you that you're getting different output? I assume that is in the climate-processor repository, so can you please make a pull request into that repository and post the test command that you're running there |
Done, requested your review to the znicholls account. |
|
Finished off in mzecc#8 |
|
Good to merge? |
|
Yep |
Description
In the process for porting the AR6 workflow into climate processor have been added:
Checklist
Please confirm that this pull request has done the following:
changelog/