OCPBUGS-99492: NetworkPolicies should use numeric ports instead of named ports#720
OCPBUGS-99492: NetworkPolicies should use numeric ports instead of named ports#720dobsonj wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@dobsonj: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: openshift/storage. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@dobsonj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99492, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughBoth DNS egress NetworkPolicies now explicitly allow TCP and UDP traffic on numeric port 53 instead of named DNS port values. ChangesDNS egress policy updates
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dobsonj The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@dobsonj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99492, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
|
@dobsonj: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-99492
/cc @openshift/storage
Summary by CodeRabbit