CONSOLE-5204: Add PR template#1141
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@logonoff: This pull request references CONSOLE-5204 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label px-approved |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
px-approved
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📜 Recent review details🧰 Additional context used🔀 Multi-repo context openshift/consoleopenshift/console
Notes:
WalkthroughAdds a new pull request template at Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 12✅ Passed checks (12 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
docs-approved
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
verified
|
@logonoff: The DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@logonoff: This pull request references CONSOLE-5204 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/pull_request_template.md`:
- Around line 8-11: Summary: Replace the incorrect phrase "For e.g" with a
correct form. Locate the two occurrences of the literal strings "For e.g
Features: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CONSOLE-XXXX" and "For e.g Jira
Bug Fixes: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-XXXX" and change "For
e.g" to "For example," (or alternatively "E.g.,") so the lines read "For example
Features: ..." (better: "For example, Features: ...") and "For example, Jira Bug
Fixes: ..." ensuring punctuation and spacing are correct.
- Line 41: Remove or adapt the frontend-specific UX review instruction that
reads "If there are visual, content, or interaction changes in the PR, tag
\"@openshift/team-ux-review\"" and similarly remove or revise other
frontend-specific sections ("Browser conformance testing", "Screenshots/screen
recordings", and "PX approver") in docs/pull_request_template.md so the template
reflects a backend/operator workflow; replace them with operator-appropriate
guidance (e.g., testing for cluster compatibility, upgrade/migration notes, and
owner/approver expectations) and ensure the UX/team-ux-review reference is
deleted or replaced with an appropriate operator reviewer group.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 5a63ef0d-9ad0-4dd7-972b-4e832df5d41f
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/pull_request_template.md
📜 Review details
🧰 Additional context used
🔀 Multi-repo context openshift/console
openshift/console
-
New PR template added: docs/pull_request_template.md — file content includes required PR sections (Analysis/Root cause, Solution description, Screenshots, Test setup/cases, Browser conformance, Additional info, Reviewers/assignees). [::openshift/console::docs/pull_request_template.md]
-
Internal doc references updated/pointing to the new template:
- AGENTS.md line ~93 references docs/pull_request_template.md as the PR template contributors should fill out. [::openshift/console::AGENTS.md:93]
Notes:
- No code/API/type/export changes in this PR.
- No other repositories available to search for cross-repo impact.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/pull_request_template.md (1)
29-33: Verify relevance of browser conformance section for an operator repository.The browser conformance checklist is typically relevant for frontend web applications. Since
console-operatoris a Kubernetes operator (backend infrastructure component), browser-specific testing may not be applicable to most PRs in this repository.Consider whether this section should be:
- Removed entirely
- Made optional/conditional
- Clarified to indicate it only applies to specific types of changes
If browser testing is indeed necessary for console-operator changes, please clarify in the template when this section applies.
| For e.g Features: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CONSOLE-XXXX | ||
| - CONSOLE-XXXX: <title> | ||
| For e.g Jira Bug Fixes: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-XXXX | ||
| - OCPBUGS-XXXX: <title> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix grammatical error: "For e.g" is incorrect.
The phrase "For e.g" is grammatically incorrect as it redundantly combines "for example" with the abbreviation "e.g." (which already means "for example"). Use either "For example," or "E.g.," but not both.
📝 Proposed fix
- For e.g Features: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CONSOLE-XXXX
+ For example, Features: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CONSOLE-XXXX
- CONSOLE-XXXX: <title>
- For e.g Jira Bug Fixes: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-XXXX
+ For example, Bug Fixes: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-XXXX
- OCPBUGS-XXXX: <title>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/pull_request_template.md` around lines 8 - 11, Summary: Replace the
incorrect phrase "For e.g" with a correct form. Locate the two occurrences of
the literal strings "For e.g Features:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CONSOLE-XXXX" and "For e.g Jira Bug Fixes:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-XXXX" and change "For e.g" to "For
example," (or alternatively "E.g.,") so the lines read "For example Features:
..." (better: "For example, Features: ...") and "For example, Jira Bug Fixes:
..." ensuring punctuation and spacing are correct.
| **Reviewers and assignees:** | ||
| <!-- | ||
| - Tag an OCP console engineer to review the changes and verify the functionality. | ||
| - If there are visual, content, or interaction changes in the PR, tag "@openshift/team-ux-review" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this team handle is referenced elsewhere in the repository
rg -i "team-ux-review" --type mdRepository: openshift/console-operator
Length of output: 197
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if openshift/console has a similar PR template with team-ux-review
if [ -f "docs/pull_request_template.md" ]; then
echo "=== openshift/console PR template exists ==="
cat -n "docs/pull_request_template.md" | head -50
fiRepository: openshift/console
Length of output: 2096
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check what teams or processes are mentioned in console-operator docs/guidelines
find . -type f \( -name "*.md" -o -name "*.txt" \) | head -20 | xargs grep -l -i "review\|team\|contributor" 2>/dev/null | head -10Repository: openshift/console-operator
Length of output: 466
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check console-operator's contribution guidelines and review process
for file in CONTRIBUTING.md DEVELOPMENT.md README.md; do
if [ -f "$file" ]; then
echo "=== $file ==="
head -100 "$file"
fi
doneRepository: openshift/console-operator
Length of output: 2927
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the full console-operator PR template to see what it actually says
cat -n docs/pull_request_template.mdRepository: openshift/console-operator
Length of output: 2071
Remove or adapt the UX review instruction for console-operator.
The PR template in console-operator was copied directly from openshift/console without accounting for the different nature of each repository. Console-operator is a backend Kubernetes operator managing console deployment—it doesn't produce visual, content, or interaction changes. The instruction to tag @openshift/team-ux-review is not applicable here.
Additionally, other sections of this template are also misaligned for an operator repository, including:
- Browser conformance testing (lines 29–33) — irrelevant for backend code
- Screenshots/screen recordings (line 20) — unlikely to be needed
- PX approver assignment (line 50) — not applicable to operator PRs
Either adapt the entire template for console-operator's actual contribution process or remove sections specific to frontend development.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/pull_request_template.md` at line 41, Remove or adapt the
frontend-specific UX review instruction that reads "If there are visual,
content, or interaction changes in the PR, tag \"@openshift/team-ux-review\""
and similarly remove or revise other frontend-specific sections ("Browser
conformance testing", "Screenshots/screen recordings", and "PX approver") in
docs/pull_request_template.md so the template reflects a backend/operator
workflow; replace them with operator-appropriate guidance (e.g., testing for
cluster compatibility, upgrade/migration notes, and owner/approver expectations)
and ensure the UX/team-ux-review reference is deleted or replaced with an
appropriate operator reviewer group.
logonoff
force-pushed
the
CONSOLE-5204-template
branch
from
75ae4c8 to
0505526
Compare
openshift-ci-robot
removed
the
verified
|
/verified bypass |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
verified
|
@logonoff: The DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, logonoff The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
approved
|
/retest |
|
@logonoff: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
3 participants
Copied from console openshift/console#16287
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Note