Skip to content

Fix for OCPBUGS-81600: CVE-2026-4800 - #16564

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.17from
germanparente:4.17-CVE-2026-4800
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

Fix for OCPBUGS-81600: CVE-2026-4800#16564
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.17from
germanparente:4.17-CVE-2026-4800

Conversation

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CVE-2026-4800: Arbitrary code execution via untrusted input in template imports

…rusted input in template imports

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 8, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81600, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81604 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

CVE-2026-4800: Arbitrary code execution via untrusted input in template imports

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: c17d99b6-d950-4e14-8160-ba3ab0f1ed20

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from jhadvig and spadgett June 8, 2026 16:47
@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-console

1 similar comment
@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-console

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 23, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81600, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81604 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81604 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-console

2 similar comments
@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-console

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-console

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label backport-risk-assessed

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jul 27, 2026
@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The e2e-gcp-console failure is not related to this PR's changes. The Cypress e2e tests timed out after ~4 hours, with infrastructure lease renewal failures (502/503 errors) during the run. All tests that completed before the timeout passed successfully.

/retest

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

more than 5 runs and assessment that the PR is not related with the failure:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@germanparente: Overrode contexts on behalf of germanparente: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console

Details

In response to this:

more than 5 runs and assessment that the PR is not related with the failure:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@prabhapa

prabhapa commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/lgtm
/label approved
/verified by CI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Aug 3, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@prabhapa: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm
/label approved
/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-gcp-console

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 3, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: germanparente, prabhapa
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign spadgett for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 3, 2026
@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The approve label was already done here.

/label approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 3, 2026
@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

the test was already overriden

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@germanparente: Overrode contexts on behalf of germanparente: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console

Details

In response to this:

the test was already overriden

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test backend

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b392b2b and 2 for PR HEAD e20891d in total

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test backend

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

CI Failure Analysis: pull-ci-openshift-console-release-4.17-backend

Verdict: Flake — unrelated to this PR.

The failure is in pkg/helm/actions backend Go tests, while this PR only changes frontend files (frontend/package.json, frontend/packages/console-plugin-shared/package.json, frontend/yarn.lock).

Root Cause

TestMain in setup_test.go:24 panics because cacertCreate.sh fails with exit status 1. The underlying error is a connection refused (errno=111) during an OpenSSL connect call — the local ChartMuseum TLS server wasn't ready before the cert verification script ran.

connect:errno=111
panic: Error waiting program :./testdata/cacertCreate.sh::exit status 1

This is a race condition in the helm test setup and has been observed across multiple retests. All other test packages pass.

/retest

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@germanparente: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console e20891d link true /test e2e-gcp-console

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot
openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 2c5a749 into openshift:release-4.17 Aug 4, 2026
7 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@germanparente: An error was encountered invalid pull identifier with 2 parts: "advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm" for bug OCPBUGS-81600 on the Jira server at https://redhat.atlassian.net. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message.

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81600
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81600 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

CVE-2026-4800: Arbitrary code execution via untrusted input in template imports

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants