OCPBUGS-101964: [release-4.22] OCPBUGS-98213: fix router component ordering to prevent missing HAProxy backends by bennerv · Pull Request #9212 · openshift/hypershift

bennerv · 2026-08-03T19:02:53Z

Summary

Cherry-pick of PR #8971 to release-4.22 with manual conflict resolution and adaptation fixes.

Moves router component registration after all route-creating components (ignition-server, metrics-proxy) so the HAProxy config includes every route on the first reconcile pass
Adds router predicate on ARO-HCP to wait for expected routes before reconciling
Excludes ignition-server and ignition-server-proxy from implicit KAS dependency
Conditionally includes oauth-internal in ARO route predicate

Commits

77e577f6c4: fix(control-plane-operator): ensure router component runs after route-creating components
c995ad02f6: fix(control-plane-operator): drop metrics-proxy from router WithDependencies
2b9df60b2f: fix(control-plane-component): exclude ignition-server from implicit KAS dependency
00e36f3406: fix(router): conditionally include oauth-internal in ARO route predicate
d565a6ed5b: fix(control-plane-component): exclude ignition-server-proxy from implicit KAS dependency

Fixes Applied

Resolved merge conflict in hostedcontrolplane_controller_test.go (test functions present on main but not on release-4.22)
Replaced support/netutil imports with support/util (netutil package does not exist on release-4.22)
Replaced gomock-generated mock with FakeReleaseProvider (mock file not generated on release-4.22)

References

Original PR: OCPBUGS-98213: fix router component ordering to prevent missing HAProxy backends #8971
JIRA: OCPBUGS-98213

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

…-creating components Add a predicate to the router component that ensures all expected HCP router routes exist and are ready before reconciling on ARO-HCP clusters. This includes kube-apiserver-internal, konnectivity-server, oauth-internal, ignition-server, and conditionally metrics-proxy when metrics forwarding is enabled. The router also declares explicit WithDependencies on ignition-server and metrics-proxy components to give the informer cache more time to sync after those components create their routes via server-side apply. Add a TODO for introducing live reloading (like shared proxy) so the router config is updated when routes change after the initial reconcile. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…dencies The metrics-proxy component is conditional (only created when MetricsForwarding.Mode=Forward), so declaring it as a hard dependency causes a deadlock on platforms where it is never instantiated (e.g. GKE). The router predicate already ensures metrics-proxy routes exist before reconciling, making the explicit dependency unnecessary. Update all 5 router fixture YAML files to match the actual declared dependency (ignition-server only). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…AS dependency The ignition-server only needs the management cluster KAS (via its service account token), not the hosted cluster KAS. Including it in the implicit KAS dependency creates a deadlock on private clusters with KMS encryption (e.g. Azure ARO-HCP with private Key Vault): Router → ignition-server → KAS → Router (for KMS connectivity) By excluding ignition-server from the KAS dependency, its deployment and route are created independently, unblocking the router, which in turn provides the network path KAS needs to reach the KMS endpoint. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

The oauth-internal route is only created by the infra reconciler when OAuth is enabled (HCPOAuthEnabled). When OAuth is disabled (e.g. OIDC authentication), the route is never created, causing the ARO router predicate to wait forever — a deadlock. Move oauth-internal from the unconditional base list to a conditional append gated on HCPOAuthEnabled, matching how the infra reconciler decides whether to create the route. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…icit KAS dependency The ignition-server-proxy component does not need the hosted KAS — it only proxies to the ignition-server, which is already excluded. Including it in the implicit KAS dependency creates the same deadlock as ignition-server on private clusters with KMS encryption: the router waits for the ignition-server-proxy Service to exist, but ignition- server-proxy waits for KAS, which waits for the router. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

- Replace support/netutil imports with support/util (netutil package does not exist on release-4.22) - Use FakeReleaseProvider instead of gomock-generated mock (mock file not generated on release-4.22) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

openshift-merge-bot · 2026-08-03T19:02:56Z

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-03T19:03:00Z

@bennerv: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98213, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target either version "4.22." or "openshift-4.22.", but it targets "5.0.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98213 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.0.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Cherry-pick of PR #8971 to release-4.22 with manual conflict resolution and adaptation fixes.

Moves router component registration after all route-creating components (ignition-server, metrics-proxy) so the HAProxy config includes every route on the first reconcile pass

Adds router predicate on ARO-HCP to wait for expected routes before reconciling

Excludes ignition-server and ignition-server-proxy from implicit KAS dependency

Conditionally includes oauth-internal in ARO route predicate

Commits

77e577f6c4: fix(control-plane-operator): ensure router component runs after route-creating components

c995ad02f6: fix(control-plane-operator): drop metrics-proxy from router WithDependencies

2b9df60b2f: fix(control-plane-component): exclude ignition-server from implicit KAS dependency

00e36f3406: fix(router): conditionally include oauth-internal in ARO route predicate

d565a6ed5b: fix(control-plane-component): exclude ignition-server-proxy from implicit KAS dependency

Fixes Applied

Resolved merge conflict in hostedcontrolplane_controller_test.go (test functions present on main but not on release-4.22)

Replaced support/netutil imports with support/util (netutil package does not exist on release-4.22)

Replaced gomock-generated mock with FakeReleaseProvider (mock file not generated on release-4.22)

References

Original PR: OCPBUGS-98213: fix router component ordering to prevent missing HAProxy backends #8971

JIRA: OCPBUGS-98213

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

coderabbitai · 2026-08-03T19:03:18Z

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: bf858a17-09f0-48e8-b0f8-db13d2dca3bd

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

🔍 Trigger review

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

bennerv · 2026-08-03T19:07:46Z

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-98213

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-03T19:08:57Z

@bennerv: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98213 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101964. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-101964: [release-4.22] OCPBUGS-98213: fix router component ordering to prevent missing HAProxy backends

Details

In response to this:

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-98213

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-03T19:09:06Z

@bennerv: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101964, which is invalid:

release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Cherry-pick of PR #8971 to release-4.22 with manual conflict resolution and adaptation fixes.

Moves router component registration after all route-creating components (ignition-server, metrics-proxy) so the HAProxy config includes every route on the first reconcile pass

Adds router predicate on ARO-HCP to wait for expected routes before reconciling

Excludes ignition-server and ignition-server-proxy from implicit KAS dependency

Conditionally includes oauth-internal in ARO route predicate

Commits

77e577f6c4: fix(control-plane-operator): ensure router component runs after route-creating components

c995ad02f6: fix(control-plane-operator): drop metrics-proxy from router WithDependencies

2b9df60b2f: fix(control-plane-component): exclude ignition-server from implicit KAS dependency

00e36f3406: fix(router): conditionally include oauth-internal in ARO route predicate

d565a6ed5b: fix(control-plane-component): exclude ignition-server-proxy from implicit KAS dependency

Fixes Applied

Resolved merge conflict in hostedcontrolplane_controller_test.go (test functions present on main but not on release-4.22)

Replaced support/netutil imports with support/util (netutil package does not exist on release-4.22)

Replaced gomock-generated mock with FakeReleaseProvider (mock file not generated on release-4.22)

References

Original PR: OCPBUGS-98213: fix router component ordering to prevent missing HAProxy backends #8971

JIRA: OCPBUGS-98213

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

codecov · 2026-08-03T19:15:13Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.45455% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 36.36%. Comparing base (41cbcdf) to head (829f432).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on release-4.22.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...trollers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/router/component.go	85.18%	6 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-4.22    #9212      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage         36.34%   36.36%   +0.02%     
================================================
  Files               775      775              
  Lines             95049    95110      +61     
================================================
+ Hits              34545    34591      +46     
- Misses            57679    57692      +13     
- Partials           2825     2827       +2

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller.go	`36.78% <100.00%> (ø)`
support/controlplane-component/status.go	`72.28% <ø> (ø)`
...trollers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/router/component.go	`63.88% <85.18%> (+63.88%)`	⬆️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

bennerv · 2026-08-03T19:47:35Z

+func TestRouterComponentComesAfterRouteCreatingComponents(t *testing.T) {
+	t.Parallel()
+
+	reconciler := &HostedControlPlaneReconciler{


releaseinfo.NewMockedProvider.... isn't on release-4.22, hence why we just use a fake release provider here.

Built from openshift/hypershift cherry-pick-OCPBUGS-98213-to-release-4.22 at commit 829f43241b (openshift/hypershift#9212). Image: arohcpocpdev.azurecr.io/control-plane-operator@sha256:2a9a553057e74e9263829ad636213cad63f9d8ae91a104e0a3d593a0164ce294 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

bryan-cox

/approve

openshift-ci · 2026-08-03T19:57:26Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bennerv, bryan-cox

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [bryan-cox]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

bryan-cox · 2026-08-03T19:57:49Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-03T19:57:54Z

@bryan-cox: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101964, which is invalid:

release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

bryan-cox · 2026-08-03T20:01:05Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-03T20:01:12Z

@bryan-cox: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101964, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98213 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98213 targets the "5.0.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 5.0.0
bug has dependents

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Built from openshift/hypershift cherry-pick-OCPBUGS-98213-to-release-4.22 at commit 829f43241b (openshift/hypershift#9212). Image: arohcpocpdev.azurecr.io/control-plane-operator@sha256:2a9a553057e74e9263829ad636213cad63f9d8ae91a104e0a3d593a0164ce294 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

twolff-gh · 2026-08-05T20:11:46Z

/verified by @twolff-gh
single rollout, complete HAProxy config from the first reconcile

CPO override test cluster showed 1 configmap create + 1 deployment create, no subsequent CPO updates, single replicaset

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-05T20:11:57Z

@twolff-gh: This PR has been marked as verified by @twolff-gh.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @twolff-gh
single rollout, complete HAProxy config from the first reconcile

CPO override test cluster showed 1 configmap create + 1 deployment create, no subsequent CPO updates, single replicaset

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

twolff-gh · 2026-08-05T20:52:58Z

/lgtm

openshift-merge-bot · 2026-08-05T20:53:34Z

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test e2e-aks
/test e2e-aws
/test e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
/test e2e-azure-self-managed
/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
/test e2e-v2-aws

bennerv · 2026-08-06T13:58:52Z

/test e2e-v2-aws

openshift-ci · 2026-08-07T09:39:12Z

@bennerv: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-07T09:43:30Z

@bennerv: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101964
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101964 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Cherry-pick of PR #8971 to release-4.22 with manual conflict resolution and adaptation fixes.

Moves router component registration after all route-creating components (ignition-server, metrics-proxy) so the HAProxy config includes every route on the first reconcile pass

Adds router predicate on ARO-HCP to wait for expected routes before reconciling

Excludes ignition-server and ignition-server-proxy from implicit KAS dependency

Conditionally includes oauth-internal in ARO route predicate

Commits

77e577f6c4: fix(control-plane-operator): ensure router component runs after route-creating components

c995ad02f6: fix(control-plane-operator): drop metrics-proxy from router WithDependencies

2b9df60b2f: fix(control-plane-component): exclude ignition-server from implicit KAS dependency

00e36f3406: fix(router): conditionally include oauth-internal in ARO route predicate

d565a6ed5b: fix(control-plane-component): exclude ignition-server-proxy from implicit KAS dependency

Fixes Applied

Resolved merge conflict in hostedcontrolplane_controller_test.go (test functions present on main but not on release-4.22)

Replaced support/netutil imports with support/util (netutil package does not exist on release-4.22)

Replaced gomock-generated mock with FakeReleaseProvider (mock file not generated on release-4.22)

References

Original PR: OCPBUGS-98213: fix router component ordering to prevent missing HAProxy backends #8971

JIRA: OCPBUGS-98213

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

bennerv · 2026-08-07T13:31:55Z

/cherry-pick release-4.21

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-08-07T13:32:39Z

@bennerv: #9212 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.21":

Applying: fix(control-plane-operator): ensure router component runs after route-creating components
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller.go
M	control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller_test.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller.go
Auto-merging control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller_test.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller_test.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 fix(control-plane-operator): ensure router component runs after route-creating components

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

bennerv · 2026-08-07T16:01:29Z

Cherry-pick to release-4.21 created in #9263 (manual conflict resolution required).

OpenShift CI Bot and others added 6 commits August 3, 2026 14:52

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 3, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/needs-area label Aug 3, 2026

openshift-ci Bot requested review from jparrill and sjenning August 3, 2026 19:03

openshift-ci Bot changed the title ~~[release-4.22] OCPBUGS-98213: fix router component ordering to prevent missing HAProxy backends~~ OCPBUGS-101964: [release-4.22] OCPBUGS-98213: fix router component ordering to prevent missing HAProxy backends Aug 3, 2026

bennerv commented Aug 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

bennerv mentioned this pull request Aug 3, 2026

do not merge: OCPBUGS-98213 Verification Azure/ARO-HCP#6033

Closed

bryan-cox reviewed Aug 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 3, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 3, 2026

openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 3, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Aug 5, 2026

openshift-ci Bot assigned twolff-gh Aug 5, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 5, 2026

csrwng added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Aug 7, 2026

openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 0cb524b into openshift:release-4.22 Aug 7, 2026
24 checks passed

bennerv deleted the cherry-pick-OCPBUGS-98213-to-release-4.22 branch August 7, 2026 13:31

bennerv mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2026

OCPBUGS-105434: OCPBUGS-98213: [release-4.21] fix router component ordering to prevent missing HAProxy backends #9263

Open

Uh oh!

Conversation

bennerv commented Aug 3, 2026

Summary

Commits

Fixes Applied

References

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-bot Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 3, 2026

Summary

Commits

Fixes Applied

References

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Review skipped

Uh oh!

bennerv commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 3, 2026

Summary

Commits

Fixes Applied

References

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Aug 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

bennerv Aug 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

bryan-cox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

bryan-cox commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

bryan-cox commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

twolff-gh commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

twolff-gh commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-bot Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

bennerv commented Aug 6, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 7, 2026

Summary

Commits

Fixes Applied

References

Uh oh!

bennerv commented Aug 7, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Aug 7, 2026

Uh oh!

bennerv commented Aug 7, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

codecov Bot commented Aug 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading