OCPBUGS-120685: fix(e2e): label flaking nodepool osImageStream test informing - #9505
Conversation
This test was recently introduced and is now flaking, it probably should be been marked informing until it was proven stable. This commit marks the test as informing for now.
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@ironcladlou: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-120685, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Team Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe node pool OS image stream verification test now carries the Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The OS image stream verification test is now informational while retaining its existing behavior. No current merge-readiness risk is identified. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 11✅ Passed checks (11 passed)
Full details: Stable And Deterministic Test NamesExplanation PASS. The pull request changes only the Full details: Test Structure And QualityExplanation PASS: The pull-request diff changes only the Ginkgo declaration by adding Full details: Topology-Aware Scheduling CompatibilityExplanation PASS — The pull request changes only Full details: Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only the existing Ginkgo test declaration by adding Full details: No-Weak-CryptoExplanation PASS. The pull request changes one line in Full details: Container-PrivilegesExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only the Ginkgo test declaration by adding Full details: No-Sensitive-Data-In-LogsExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only the test declaration by adding the ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Some tools did not complete. Review the errors below. 🔧 golangci-lint (2.13.2)Error: build linters: unable to load custom analyzer "hypershiftlinter": hack/tools/bin/hypershiftlinter.so, plugin: not implemented Comment |
|
@ironcladlou: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-120685, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ironcladlou The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9505 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 47.05% 47.05%
=======================================
Files 786 786
Lines 99169 99169
=======================================
Hits 46664 46664
Misses 49349 49349
Partials 3156 3156
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/lgtm |
|
/verified by E2E Passing. No deeper verification needed. |
|
/retest-required |
|
Scheduling tests matching the |
|
@jparrill: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Test Resultse2e-aks
|
|
/retest |
|
@ironcladlou: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@ironcladlou: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-120685: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:
All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-120685 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
This test was recently introduced and is now flaking, it probably should be been marked informing until it was proven stable. This commit marks the test as informing for now.
Summary by CodeRabbit