Skip to content

Conversation

@soltysh
Copy link

@soltysh soltysh commented Jan 12, 2022

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Jan 12, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from marun and mfojtik January 12, 2022 10:07
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 12, 2022
@mfojtik
Copy link

mfojtik commented Jan 12, 2022

/lgtm
/approve
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 12, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2022

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@soltysh soltysh changed the title UPSTREAM: <carry>: bump base rpm repo UPSTREAM: <carry>: fix machine-os-content image build Jan 12, 2022
@miabbott
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-gcp-rt

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2022

@miabbott: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test artifacts
  • /test configmap-scale
  • /test e2e-aws-downgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-jenkins
  • /test e2e-aws-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-upgrade
  • /test e2e-azure-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp
  • /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • /test images
  • /test integration
  • /test k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
  • /test k8s-e2e-gcp
  • /test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
  • /test unit
  • /test verify
  • /test verify-commits

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-agnostic-cmd
  • /test e2e-aws
  • /test e2e-aws-cgroupsv2
  • /test e2e-aws-crun
  • /test e2e-aws-csi
  • /test e2e-aws-csi-migration
  • /test e2e-aws-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-multitenant
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-single-node
  • /test e2e-azure
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-openstack
  • /test e2e-openstack-csi-cinder
  • /test e2e-openstack-csi-manila
  • /test e2e-vsphere
  • /test k8s-e2e-aws
  • /test k8s-e2e-aws-serial
  • /test k8s-e2e-gcp-five-control-plane-replicas

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-artifacts
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-agnostic-cmd
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-cgroupsv2
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-crun
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-fips
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-integration
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-k8s-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-verify-commits

In response to this:

/test e2e-gcp-rt

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@miabbott
Copy link
Member

/payload 4.10 nightly informing

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2022

@miabbott: trigger 44 jobs of type informing for the nightly release of OCP 4.10

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-console-aws
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-csi
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-fips
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-aws-ovn
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-single-node
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-single-node-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-aws-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-aws-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-azure
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-azure-csi
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-azure-ovn
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-azure-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-azure-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade-single-node
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-azure-deploy-cnv
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade-cnv
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-gcp
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-gcp-csi
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-gcp-ovn
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-gcp-rt
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-gcp-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-gcp-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-metal-assisted
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-metal-assisted-ipv6
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-upgrade-from-stable-4.9-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-upgrade-from-stable-4.9-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-ovirt
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-ovirt-csi
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-upgrade-from-stable-4.9-e2e-aws-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-vsphere
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-vsphere-csi
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-vsphere-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-vsphere-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-vsphere-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-vsphere-upi
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-vsphere-upi-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/c7bc7a70-73ac-11ec-9e58-111f55f1fcaa-0

@rphillips
Copy link

@soltysh I think we should pick your readme change into #1106 so we fix this all in one merge

@soltysh
Copy link
Author

soltysh commented Jan 12, 2022

@soltysh I think we should pick your readme change into #1106 so we fix this all in one merge

@rphillips that's fine as well, if you can update your PR and pick that rebase doc update from mine, double check the FROM are picked from this as well, if you get it green by tomorrow when I'm back online I'll tag it

I'm still not sure if we need machine-config-daemon b/c from what I was checking we're running that as any other operator through an image and not directly, only crio and kubelet are required, but I might be wrong

@soltysh
Copy link
Author

soltysh commented Jan 12, 2022

/test e2e-gcp

1 similar comment
@jupierce
Copy link

/test e2e-gcp

@vrutkovs
Copy link

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@soltysh
Copy link
Author

soltysh commented Jan 13, 2022

This currently builds on top of #1106 which should merge first.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 13, 2022

@soltysh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd df27145 link false /test e2e-agnostic-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade df27145 link true /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips df27145 link true /test e2e-aws-fips
ci/prow/e2e-gcp df27145 link true /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial df27145 link true /test e2e-aws-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-cgroupsv2 df27145 link false /test e2e-aws-cgroupsv2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi df27145 link false /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-conformance-aws df27145 link true /test k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp df27145 link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-crun df27145 link false /test e2e-aws-crun
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-serial df27145 link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 13, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 14, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Jul 1, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 1, 2022

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@soltysh soltysh deleted the fix_machine branch July 15, 2024 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants