Skip to content

Conversation

@kaldesai
Copy link

@kaldesai kaldesai commented Oct 30, 2025

Affected versions: serverless-docs-1.37

Tracking JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVCOM-3983

Doc preview:

Reviews:

  • QE has approved this change.
  • SME has approved this change.
  • Peer has approved this change.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 30, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 30, 2025

@kaldesai: This pull request references SRVCOM-3983 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Affected versions: serverless-docs-1.37

Tracking JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVCOM-3983

Doc preview:

Reviews:

  • QE has approved this change.
  • SME has approved this change.
  • Peer has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 30, 2025

@kaldesai: This pull request references SRVCOM-3983 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Affected versions: serverless-docs-1.37

Tracking JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVCOM-3983

Doc preview:

Reviews:

  • QE has approved this change.
  • SME has approved this change.
  • Peer has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 30, 2025

@kaldesai: This pull request references SRVCOM-3983 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Affected versions: serverless-docs-1.37

Tracking JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVCOM-3983

Doc preview:

Reviews:

  • QE has approved this change.
  • SME has approved this change.
  • Peer has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 30, 2025
@kaldesai
Copy link
Author

/label serverless

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the serverless Label for all Serverless PRs label Oct 30, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 30, 2025

🤖 Fri Nov 21 10:15:07 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://101425--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-serverless/latest/about/serverless-release-notes.html

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 30, 2025

@kaldesai: This pull request references SRVCOM-3983 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Affected versions: serverless-docs-1.37

Tracking JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVCOM-3983

Doc preview:

Reviews:

  • QE has approved this change.
  • SME has approved this change.
  • Peer has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@maschmid
Copy link
Contributor

Assuming #101668 will be done in time for the Release, we should add "ServiceMesh 3.x integration" as a column into the TP table (as a TP for 1.37).

and also add an entry to New features, something like

Integration with ServiceMesh 3.x is now included as a Technology Preview feature

@mvinkler
Copy link

Can you also please add https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVCLI-414?

@maschmid
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM for the Serverless Core QE part (still requires an ack from Serverless Logic QE for their bits)

Copy link
Contributor

@shreyasiddhartha shreyasiddhartha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some suggestions for you to consider, otherwise lgtm! :)

Peer review done.

@kaldesai kaldesai force-pushed the SRVCOM-3983-1.37-ReleaseNotes branch from 94fb251 to 8fc6fe6 Compare November 19, 2025 20:50
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 19, 2025

@kaldesai: This pull request references SRVCOM-3983 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Affected versions: serverless-docs-1.37

Tracking JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVCOM-3983

Doc preview:

Reviews:

  • QE has approved this change.
  • SME has approved this change.
  • Peer has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kaldesai kaldesai force-pushed the SRVCOM-3983-1.37-ReleaseNotes branch from 15160f0 to 69443c4 Compare November 21, 2025 10:00
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2025

@kaldesai: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. serverless Label for all Serverless PRs size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.