Skip to content

Conversation

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor

@theashiot theashiot commented Dec 8, 2025

Version(s): 6.3

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2900

Link to docs preview: https://103514--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/release_notes/logging-release-notes.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 8, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2900 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.3

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2900

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 8, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 8, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Dec 8, 2025

🤖 Wed Dec 10 18:37:38 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://103514--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/release_notes/logging-release-notes.html

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 8, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2900 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.3

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2900

Link to docs preview: https://103514--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/release_notes/logging-release-notes.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@anpingli
Copy link

anpingli commented Dec 9, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 9, 2025
@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @anpingli for the review!

best,
ashwin

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2900 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.3

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2900

Link to docs preview: https://103514--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/release_notes/logging-release-notes.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kabirbhartiRH
Copy link

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @kabirbhartiRH, added the CVEs.

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

Copy link
Contributor

@xperimental xperimental left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me 👍

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @xperimental!

@theashiot theashiot force-pushed the OBSDOCS-2900 branch 2 times, most recently from 21255ce to 19bb9d1 Compare December 10, 2025 13:47
@briandooley briandooley marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2025 18:23
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@theashiot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@briandooley briandooley merged commit f92e368 into openshift:standalone-logging-docs-6.3 Dec 10, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants