OSDOCSs-19410-2 back porting most recent zero-trust docs to 4.18 PR#2#110927
Open
wgabor0427 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.18from
Open
OSDOCSs-19410-2 back porting most recent zero-trust docs to 4.18 PR#2#110927wgabor0427 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.18from
wgabor0427 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.18from
Conversation
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
size/M
| Install {zero-trust-full} to help ensure secure communication between your workloads. You can install the {zero-trust-full} by using either the web console or CLI. | ||
|
|
||
| include::snippets/technology-preview.adoc[] | ||
| If you install the Operator into a custom namespace (for example, `my-custom-namespace`), all managed operand resources are deployed within that same namespace. All secrets and ConfigMaps referenced by the Custom Resources (CRs) must also exist in that custom namespace. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] Vale.Terms: Use 'custom resources?' instead of 'Custom Resources'.
wgabor0427
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-19410-2
branch
from
387b4d7 to
dc0c5bb
Compare
openshift-ci
Bot
added
size/L
|
|
||
| Custom Operator metrics:: | ||
|
|
||
| The operator also exposes custom metrics related to: |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] Vale.Terms: Use 'Operators?' instead of 'operator'.
| $ oc set env --list deployment/zero-trust-workload-identity-manager-controller-manager -n zero-trust-workload-identity-manager | grep -e METRICS_BIND_ADDRESS -e METRICS_SECURE -e container | ||
| ---- | ||
| + | ||
| .Example output |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.BlockTitle: Block titles can only be assigned to examples, figures, and tables in DITA.
wgabor0427
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-19410-2
branch
from
dc0c5bb to
f8e1ca1
Compare
1 task
|
@wgabor0427: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
wgabor0427
changed the title
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Version(s):
4.18
Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-19410
Link to docs preview:
https://110927--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/security/zero_trust_workload_identity_manager/zero-trust-manager-install.html
https://110927--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/security/zero_trust_workload_identity_manager/zero-trust-manager-monitoring.html
QE review:
Additional information:
The 4.18 documentation in this PR is a copy and paste from the most recent zero-trust documentation.
This PR contains the following assemblies:
This is PR #2. This is related to the following PRs:
The PRs were put into smaller PRs instead of having one large PR. This makes it easier for the merge reviewers.