Skip to content

Documentation gives example of deprecated priorityClass configuration apiVersion #26005

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
mburke5678 merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2020
Merged

Documentation gives example of deprecated priorityClass configuration apiVersion #26005

mburke5678 merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2020

Conversation

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

@mburke5678 mburke5678 commented Sep 30, 2020

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 30, 2020
@openshift-docs-preview-bot
Copy link

openshift-docs-preview-bot commented Sep 30, 2020

The preview will be available shortly at:

@sunilcio
Copy link

sunilcio commented Oct 22, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Oct 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 22, 2020

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 26, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 26, 2020
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor Author

mburke5678 commented Oct 26, 2020

@sunilcio Do you know which OpenShift version introduced scheduling.k8s.io/v1?

@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Oct 26, 2020
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat self-requested a review October 26, 2020 18:25
jeana-redhat
jeana-redhat approved these changes Oct 26, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 26, 2020
@mburke5678 mburke5678 merged commit 6f6ffdf into openshift:master Oct 26, 2020
@mburke5678 mburke5678 mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2020
Merged
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor Author

mburke5678 commented Oct 26, 2020 •
edited by openshift-ci-robot
Loading

/cherrypick enterprise-4.5

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2020
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 26, 2020 •
edited by openshift-ci-robot
Loading

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #26728

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor Author

mburke5678 commented Oct 26, 2020 •
edited by openshift-ci-robot
Loading

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2020
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 26, 2020 •
edited by openshift-ci-robot
Loading

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #26729

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor Author

mburke5678 commented Oct 27, 2020 •
edited by openshift-ci-robot
Loading

/cherrypick enterprise-4.7

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 27, 2020 •
edited by openshift-ci-robot
Loading

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #26760

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2020
Merged
@mburke5678 mburke5678 deleted the BZ-1879382 branch October 27, 2020 13:00
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 27, 2020

@mburke5678: cannot checkout enterprise-4.5: error checking out enterprise-4.5: exit status 1. output: error: pathspec 'enterprise-4.5' did not match any file(s) known to git

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 27, 2020

@mburke5678: cannot checkout enterprise-4.6: error checking out enterprise-4.6: exit status 1. output: error: pathspec 'enterprise-4.6' did not match any file(s) known to git

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 27, 2020

@mburke5678: cannot checkout enterprise-4.7: error checking out enterprise-4.7: exit status 1. output: error: pathspec 'enterprise-4.7' did not match any file(s) known to git

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat jeana-redhat approved these changes

Assignees

@sunilcio sunilcio

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.4 branch/enterprise-4.5 branch/enterprise-4.6 branch/enterprise-4.7 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@mburke5678 @openshift-docs-preview-bot @sunilcio @openshift-ci-robot @openshift-cherrypick-robot @jeana-redhat