Skip to content

Conversation

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer commented Mar 23, 2021

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer added peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR branch/enterprise-4.5 branch/enterprise-4.6 branch/enterprise-4.7 branch/enterprise-4.8 issue-burndown Indicates an issue worked on during an "GitHub Issue Burndown" session labels Mar 23, 2021
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer added this to the Next Release milestone Mar 23, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 23, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 23, 2021

Deploy preview for osdocs ready!

Built with commit ef24ddd

https://deploy-preview-30784--osdocs.netlify.app

@bmcelvee bmcelvee added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Mar 23, 2021
@bmcelvee
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM!

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sunilcio
Copy link

@bergerhoffer missed this one earlier. It looks this would require review from OpenJDK team. @wsun1 do you know who can help review this one?

@sunilcio
Copy link

sunilcio commented May 7, 2021

Okay, after reviewing below links, this LGTM.
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4564491
https://www.eclipse.org/openj9/docs/xxusecontainersupport
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250627

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer merged commit 3c91b8a into openshift:master May 10, 2021
@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.8

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.7

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.5

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #32378

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #32379

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #32380

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #32381

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer deleted the github-26681 branch August 3, 2022 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.5 branch/enterprise-4.6 branch/enterprise-4.7 branch/enterprise-4.8 issue-burndown Indicates an issue worked on during an "GitHub Issue Burndown" session peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

memory settings for jdk11+ on openshift

5 participants