Skip to content

Conversation

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer commented May 2, 2022

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer added peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR branch/enterprise-4.11 labels May 2, 2022
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer added this to the Future Release milestone May 2, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 2, 2022
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 2, 2022

Deploy Preview for osdocs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit eacc5c3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/osdocs/deploys/62704adfb8a23e00088f6d02
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-45264--osdocs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

Copy link
Contributor

@jldohmann jldohmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!


[NOTE]
====
Currently, it is not supported to use Active Directory Federation Services with {product-title} when custom claims are used.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be more elaborate, would it be better to link https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-2770 (it is public) and/or https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072927?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@xingxingxia Normally I wouldn't mind linking to a BZ or Jira, but it looks like those have both been closed/rejected. So I don't know if those would be good to link to. It sounds like we're not going to change anything on our end for this, but instead hope that Microsoft will. wdyt?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, their closed/rejected statuses make it awkward to link them, though they indeed include elaborate info which may be useful. Anyway, let's not link then. Thx

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer merged commit 4c72135 into openshift:enterprise-4.11 May 23, 2022
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer deleted the OSDOCS-3533-rn branch August 3, 2022 17:19
@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Aug 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.11 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants