Skip to content

OSDOCS-3533: Added release note for ADFS as supported OIDC provider #45264

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2022
Merged

OSDOCS-3533: Added release note for ADFS as supported OIDC provider #45264

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions release_notes/ocp-4-11-release-notes.adoc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -139,6 +139,18 @@ For more information, see xref:../getting_started/openshift-overview.adoc[Gettin
[id="ocp-4-11-auth"]
=== Authentication and authorization

[id="ocp-4-11-auth-oidc-providers"]
==== Active Directory Federation Services is now a supported OIDC provider

The Active Directory Federation Services OpenID Connect (OIDC) provider is now tested and supported with {product-title}.

[NOTE]
====
Currently, it is not supported to use Active Directory Federation Services with {product-title} when custom claims are used.
Copy link
Contributor

@xingxingxia xingxingxia May 12, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be more elaborate, would it be better to link https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-2770 (it is public) and/or https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072927?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer May 12, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@xingxingxia Normally I wouldn't mind linking to a BZ or Jira, but it looks like those have both been closed/rejected. So I don't know if those would be good to link to. It sounds like we're not going to change anything on our end for this, but instead hope that Microsoft will. wdyt?

Copy link
Contributor

@xingxingxia xingxingxia May 13, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, their closed/rejected statuses make it awkward to link them, though they indeed include elaborate info which may be useful. Anyway, let's not link then. Thx

====

For the full list of OIDC providers, see xref:../authentication/identity_providers/configuring-oidc-identity-provider.adoc#identity-provider-oidc-supported_configuring-oidc-identity-provider[Supported OIDC providers].

[id="ocp-4-11-notable-technical-changes"]
== Notable technical changes

Expand Down