OCPBUGS-2049: Adding known issue about Nutanix install to 4.11 RN #51459

skrthomas · 2022-10-10T19:47:23Z

Version(s):
This RN need to be added in 4.11+, but this PR is only for 4.11.

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2049

Link to docs preview:

https://51459--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-11-release-notes.html#ocp-4-11-known-issues (ctrl+f "Nutanix")
QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-10-10T19:47:26Z

@skrthomas: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.11

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2049

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

ocpdocs-previewbot · 2022-10-10T19:56:23Z

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://51459--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/1828

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-10-11T14:32:52Z

@skrthomas: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Verified instead
expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.11+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2049

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-10-11T14:33:46Z

@skrthomas: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Verified instead
expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Version(s):
This RN needs updating in 4.11+, but this PR is only for 4.11.

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2049

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

opayne1 · 2022-10-11T20:04:15Z

release_notes/ocp-4-11-release-notes.adoc

Small note based on our slack convo

Suggested change

* There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if you use 4096-bit certificates with Prism Central 2022.x. Instead, use 2048-bit certificates. (link:https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6976743[Red Hat Customer Portal solution])

* There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if you use 4096-bit certificates with Prism Central 2022.x. Instead, use 2048-bit certificates. (link:https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6976743[*KCS*])

@pneedle-rh Thanks for your peer review. I put "KCS" after asking Olivia, and she brought it up with the other Release Notes folks since there isn't another case like it. They recommended to just use KCS. See ☝️

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-10-12T14:47:40Z

@skrthomas: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049, which is invalid:

expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Version(s):
This RN need to be added in 4.11+, but this PR is only for 4.11.

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2049

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-10-12T15:50:23Z

@skrthomas: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049, which is invalid:

expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Version(s):
This RN need to be added in 4.11+, but this PR is only for 4.11.

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2049

Link to docs preview:

https://51459--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-11-release-notes.html#ocp-4-11-known-issues (ctrl+f "Nutanix")
QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sgaoshang · 2022-10-13T03:12:06Z

/lgtm, thanks.

skrthomas · 2022-10-13T19:59:34Z

@kalexand-rh Following the change management steps, can you approve this from the DPM end?
@ericrich can you ACK this for Product Experience?
@rvanderp3 @makentenza Can you ACK for Engineering/SME and Project Manager end?

Thank you :)

kalexand-rh · 2022-10-13T20:45:23Z

If you implement Olivia's edit, it LGTM.

rvanderp3 · 2022-10-14T12:50:22Z

@skrthomas lgtm

sferich888 · 2022-10-19T18:28:49Z

/lgtm

makentenza · 2022-10-20T08:36:27Z

@skrthomas LGTM

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-10-20T14:19:58Z

@skrthomas: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049, which is invalid:

expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Version(s):
This RN need to be added in 4.11+, but this PR is only for 4.11.

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2049

Link to docs preview:

https://51459--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-11-release-notes.html#ocp-4-11-known-issues (ctrl+f "Nutanix")
QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

skrthomas · 2022-10-20T14:21:43Z

All the change mgmt has been ACK'd.

pneedle-rh

@skrthomas I have added a couple of minor suggestions for this PR. Aside from those, this looks good to me!

pneedle-rh · 2022-10-21T07:56:45Z

release_notes/ocp-4-11-release-notes.adoc


 * There is a known issue on Nutanix where persistent volumes (PVs) created by a cluster are not cleaned up by the  `destroy cluster` command. As a workaround for this issue, you need to clean up the PVs manually. (link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108700[*BZ#2108700*])

+* There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if you use 4096-bit certificates with Prism Central 2022.x. Instead, use 2048-bit certificates. (link:https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6976743[*KCS*])


You could minimise "There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if" to the following:

There is a known issue where Nutanix installation fails if

pneedle-rh · 2022-10-21T07:58:46Z

release_notes/ocp-4-11-release-notes.adoc


 * There is a known issue on Nutanix where persistent volumes (PVs) created by a cluster are not cleaned up by the  `destroy cluster` command. As a workaround for this issue, you need to clean up the PVs manually. (link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108700[*BZ#2108700*])

+* There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if you use 4096-bit certificates with Prism Central 2022.x. Instead, use 2048-bit certificates. (link:https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6976743[*KCS*])


You could potentially update "KCS" to "KCS#6976743" to follow the same format as the BZ links. I can't see any other references to KCS articles in this version of the Release Notes to see what the convention is.

I commented on the feedback from Olivia regarding her suggestion for this link

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-10-21T16:49:33Z

@skrthomas: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2049 is in an unrecognized state (Release Pending) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Version(s):
This RN need to be added in 4.11+, but this PR is only for 4.11.

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2049

Link to docs preview:

https://51459--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-11-release-notes.html#ocp-4-11-known-issues (ctrl+f "Nutanix")
QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 10, 2022

openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 10, 2022

skrthomas added this to the Continuous Release milestone Oct 11, 2022

skrthomas added the branch/enterprise-4.11 label Oct 11, 2022

opayne1 reviewed Oct 11, 2022

View reviewed changes

skrthomas requested a review from sgaoshang October 12, 2022 15:53

OCPBUGS-2049: Adding known issue about Nutanix install to 4.11 RN

febe456

skrthomas force-pushed the OCPBUGS-2049-RNKI-411 branch from 53451f2 to febe456 Compare October 14, 2022 14:21

openshift-ci bot assigned sferich888 Oct 19, 2022

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 19, 2022

skrthomas added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Oct 20, 2022

pneedle-rh self-requested a review October 21, 2022 07:53

pneedle-rh added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 21, 2022

pneedle-rh reviewed Oct 21, 2022

View reviewed changes

pneedle-rh removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 21, 2022

pneedle-rh added the peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR label Oct 21, 2022

skrthomas merged commit 5e07a7a into openshift:enterprise-4.11 Oct 21, 2022

	* There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if you use 4096-bit certificates with Prism Central 2022.x. Instead, use 2048-bit certificates. (link:https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6976743[Red Hat Customer Portal solution])
	* There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if you use 4096-bit certificates with Prism Central 2022.x. Instead, use 2048-bit certificates. (link:https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6976743[KCS])


		* There is a known issue on Nutanix where persistent volumes (PVs) created by a cluster are not cleaned up by the `destroy cluster` command. As a workaround for this issue, you need to clean up the PVs manually. (link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108700[BZ#2108700])

		* There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if you use 4096-bit certificates with Prism Central 2022.x. Instead, use 2048-bit certificates. (link:https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6976743[KCS])

OCPBUGS-2049: Adding known issue about Nutanix install to 4.11 RN #51459

OCPBUGS-2049: Adding known issue about Nutanix install to 4.11 RN #51459

Uh oh!

Conversation

skrthomas commented Oct 10, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 10, 2022

Uh oh!

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 10, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2022

Uh oh!

opayne1 Oct 11, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

skrthomas Oct 21, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 12, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 12, 2022

Uh oh!

sgaoshang commented Oct 13, 2022

Uh oh!

skrthomas commented Oct 13, 2022

Uh oh!

kalexand-rh commented Oct 13, 2022

Uh oh!

rvanderp3 commented Oct 14, 2022

Uh oh!

sferich888 commented Oct 19, 2022

Uh oh!

makentenza commented Oct 20, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 20, 2022

Uh oh!

skrthomas commented Oct 20, 2022

Uh oh!

pneedle-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pneedle-rh Oct 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pneedle-rh Oct 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

skrthomas Oct 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 21, 2022

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

10 participants

skrthomas commented Oct 10, 2022 •

edited

Loading

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 10, 2022 •

edited

Loading

skrthomas Oct 21, 2022 •

edited

Loading