Skip to content

OCPBUGS-2049: Adding known issue about Nutanix install to 4.11 RN #51459

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2022
Merged

OCPBUGS-2049: Adding known issue about Nutanix install to 4.11 RN #51459

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions release_notes/ocp-4-11-release-notes.adoc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2456,6 +2456,8 @@ openshift.io/scc: hostmount-anyuid

* There is a known issue on Nutanix where persistent volumes (PVs) created by a cluster are not cleaned up by the `destroy cluster` command. As a workaround for this issue, you need to clean up the PVs manually. (link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108700[*BZ#2108700*])

* There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if you use 4096-bit certificates with Prism Central 2022.x. Instead, use 2048-bit certificates. (link:https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6976743[*KCS*])
Copy link
Contributor

@pneedle-rh pneedle-rh Oct 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could minimise "There is a known issue with Nutanix installation where the installation fails if" to the following:

There is a known issue where Nutanix installation fails if

Copy link
Contributor

@pneedle-rh pneedle-rh Oct 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could potentially update "KCS" to "KCS#6976743" to follow the same format as the BZ links. I can't see any other references to KCS articles in this version of the Release Notes to see what the convention is.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrthomas skrthomas Oct 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I commented on the feedback from Olivia regarding her suggestion for this link


* There is currently a known issue when creating and editing `egressqos` with incorrect syntax or values success. The incorrect values in `egressqos` should not create successfully. There is currently no workaround for this issue.
(link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097579[*BZ#2097579*])

Expand Down